中国土地科学
中國土地科學
중국토지과학
HINA LAND SCIENCE
2013年
3期
36-42
,共7页
土地制度%土地政策效果%土地例行督察%土地违法%面板数据模型
土地製度%土地政策效果%土地例行督察%土地違法%麵闆數據模型
토지제도%토지정책효과%토지례행독찰%토지위법%면판수거모형
land institution%land policy effect%regular land supervision%land law violations%panel-data model
研究目的:分析土地例行督察对土地违法的遏制效果,并测算效果大小,为进一步完善土地例行督察以遏制土地违法蔓延提供建议.研究方法:基于1999—2010年的省际面板数据,分别采用固定效应模型、随机效应模型和混合OLS模型加以估计,并采用固定效应模型的估计结果测算土地例行督察的土地违法遏制效果.研究结果:(1)土地例行督察对遏制土地违法有效果,且土地例行督察比例每提高1%,土地违法涉案土地面积减少17.12 hm2;(2)实施土地例行督察后,2008—2010年的土地违法案件涉及的土地总面积分别减少804.59 hm2、4355.11 hm2和8363.14 hm2,分别占当年土地违法案件涉及土地面积的2.46%、15.78%和29.98%,且2010年的土地例行督察效果好于2009年;(3)从土地例行督察的区域差异来看,2008—2010年西部地区土地例行督察效率都明显高于东、中部地区.研究结论:土地例行督察能够有效遏制土地违法蔓延,扩大对欠发达地区的土地例行督察范围,能够较大程度提高土地例行督察效果,遏制欠发达地区土地违法快速扩张态势.
研究目的:分析土地例行督察對土地違法的遏製效果,併測算效果大小,為進一步完善土地例行督察以遏製土地違法蔓延提供建議.研究方法:基于1999—2010年的省際麵闆數據,分彆採用固定效應模型、隨機效應模型和混閤OLS模型加以估計,併採用固定效應模型的估計結果測算土地例行督察的土地違法遏製效果.研究結果:(1)土地例行督察對遏製土地違法有效果,且土地例行督察比例每提高1%,土地違法涉案土地麵積減少17.12 hm2;(2)實施土地例行督察後,2008—2010年的土地違法案件涉及的土地總麵積分彆減少804.59 hm2、4355.11 hm2和8363.14 hm2,分彆佔噹年土地違法案件涉及土地麵積的2.46%、15.78%和29.98%,且2010年的土地例行督察效果好于2009年;(3)從土地例行督察的區域差異來看,2008—2010年西部地區土地例行督察效率都明顯高于東、中部地區.研究結論:土地例行督察能夠有效遏製土地違法蔓延,擴大對欠髮達地區的土地例行督察範圍,能夠較大程度提高土地例行督察效果,遏製欠髮達地區土地違法快速擴張態勢.
연구목적:분석토지례행독찰대토지위법적알제효과,병측산효과대소,위진일보완선토지례행독찰이알제토지위법만연제공건의.연구방법:기우1999—2010년적성제면판수거,분별채용고정효응모형、수궤효응모형화혼합OLS모형가이고계,병채용고정효응모형적고계결과측산토지례행독찰적토지위법알제효과.연구결과:(1)토지례행독찰대알제토지위법유효과,차토지례행독찰비례매제고1%,토지위법섭안토지면적감소17.12 hm2;(2)실시토지례행독찰후,2008—2010년적토지위법안건섭급적토지총면적분별감소804.59 hm2、4355.11 hm2화8363.14 hm2,분별점당년토지위법안건섭급토지면적적2.46%、15.78%화29.98%,차2010년적토지례행독찰효과호우2009년;(3)종토지례행독찰적구역차이래간,2008—2010년서부지구토지례행독찰효솔도명현고우동、중부지구.연구결론:토지례행독찰능구유효알제토지위법만연,확대대흠발체지구적토지례행독찰범위,능구교대정도제고토지례행독찰효과,알제흠발체지구토지위법쾌속확장태세.
@@@@The objectives of the paper are to analyze the effect and its degree of the regular land supervision on controlling land law violations. Methods of fixed-effects model, random-effects model and pooled OLS model were applied to estimate the question based on the panel data from 1999 to 2010. The test on those models suggests that the fixed-effects model is more appropriate than random-effects model and pooled OLS model. After the model test, effect of the regular land supervision on controlling land law violations was estimated. The result shows that 1) the regular land supervision had positive effect on controlling land law violations, i.e., the area of land law violations would decrease about 17.12 hm2 if regular land supervision rate increase 1%; 2) the area of land law violations in 2008, 2009 and 2010 decreased 804.59 hm2, 4355.11 hm2 and 8363.14 hm2, respectively. The regular land supervision effects in those years were 2.46%, 15.78% and 29.98%, respectively. Furthermore, the effect in 2010 was better than that of 2009; 3) the western region was higher than the eastern region and central region in 2008 to 2010 if we compare the regular land supervision efficiency between different regions. The paper concludes that the findings show that the regular land supervision had a significantly positive effect on controlling land law violations. Increasing regular land supervision area in underdeveloped region can improve the effect to control further spread of land law violations.
