肿瘤药学
腫瘤藥學
종류약학
ANTI-TUMOR PHARMACY
2013年
2期
136-138
,共3页
腹腔镜%结肠癌%分期%临床疗效
腹腔鏡%結腸癌%分期%臨床療效
복강경%결장암%분기%림상료효
Laparoscopic surgery%Colorectal cancer%Tumor stage%Clinical efficacy
目的探讨腹腔镜手术应用于不同分期结肠癌患者的临床疗效.方法选择2010年4月~2011年7月我院收治的180例结肠癌患者,将其随机分为观察组和对照组,每组90例,观察组患者采用腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组患者采用开腹手术进行治疗,比较两组患者的肿瘤分期及治疗后的远处转移、局部复发和远期并发症情况.结果对照组患者术后切口疝和肠梗阻等远期并发症的发生率均明显高于观察组(P<0.05),而两组患者的远处转移、局部复发率及术后1年生存率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论腹腔镜结肠癌手术应用于各分期的结肠癌患者均可获得较好的临床疗效,且远期并发症发生率降低,值得临床推广应用.
目的探討腹腔鏡手術應用于不同分期結腸癌患者的臨床療效.方法選擇2010年4月~2011年7月我院收治的180例結腸癌患者,將其隨機分為觀察組和對照組,每組90例,觀察組患者採用腹腔鏡手術治療,對照組患者採用開腹手術進行治療,比較兩組患者的腫瘤分期及治療後的遠處轉移、跼部複髮和遠期併髮癥情況.結果對照組患者術後切口疝和腸梗阻等遠期併髮癥的髮生率均明顯高于觀察組(P<0.05),而兩組患者的遠處轉移、跼部複髮率及術後1年生存率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論腹腔鏡結腸癌手術應用于各分期的結腸癌患者均可穫得較好的臨床療效,且遠期併髮癥髮生率降低,值得臨床推廣應用.
목적탐토복강경수술응용우불동분기결장암환자적림상료효.방법선택2010년4월~2011년7월아원수치적180례결장암환자,장기수궤분위관찰조화대조조,매조90례,관찰조환자채용복강경수술치료,대조조환자채용개복수술진행치료,비교량조환자적종류분기급치료후적원처전이、국부복발화원기병발증정황.결과대조조환자술후절구산화장경조등원기병발증적발생솔균명현고우관찰조(P<0.05),이량조환자적원처전이、국부복발솔급술후1년생존솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론복강경결장암수술응용우각분기적결장암환자균가획득교호적림상료효,차원기병발증발생솔강저,치득림상추엄응용.
@@@@Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery applied to different stages of colorectal cancer. Methods 180 cases of colorectal cancer patients admitted in our hospital from April 2011 to July 2012 were randomly divided into the observation group (90 cases) and the control group (90 cases). The observation group was treated with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer and the control group was treated with traditional surgery. The tumor stage, distant metastasis after treatment, local recurrence and long-term complications of the two groups were compared. Results The incidence rate of long-term complications (incisional hernia and intestinal obstruction) in control group was significantly higher than that in the observation group (P<0.05). No significant difference of the distant metastasis, local recurrence rate and 1 year survival rate was observed between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The laparoscopic surgery was appropriate for various stages of colorectal cancer patients, which could obtain better clinical efficacy and have less long-term complications. So it was worthy of clinical application.