CAJ | 학술논문

目的:研究PROPEXⅡ根管测量仪在牙齿根管治疗时工作长度测定中,其准确性、灵敏性,并与X线法进行比较,判断优劣及根充后疗效.方法:电测法采用美国Dentsply公司PROPEXⅡ根管测量仪进行根管长度测量,X线法采用德国Sirona公司Heliodent vario X线机摄X线片进行根管工作长度测定,进行差异性对比,并行Protaper镍钛机扩后,采用Protaper配套专用牙胶尖,B.L热牙胶充填机、法国必兰根充糊剂进行根管充填,观察1个月、半年、1年后疗效.结果:两者根管工作长度测定差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),PROPEXⅡ根管测量仪电测法普遍比X线法要短(P<0.05),但根管治疗充填后疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:PROPEXⅡ根管测量仪临床应用准确、快速、灵敏,根充后治疗效果较好.
목적:연구PROPEXⅡ근관측량의재아치근관치료시공작장도측정중,기준학성、령민성,병여X선법진행비교,판단우렬급근충후료효.방법:전측법채용미국Dentsply공사PROPEXⅡ근관측량의진행근관장도측량,X선법채용덕국Sirona공사Heliodent vario X선궤섭X선편진행근관공작장도측정,진행차이성대비,병행Protaper얼태궤확후,채용Protaper배투전용아효첨,B.L열아효충전궤、법국필란근충호제진행근관충전,관찰1개월、반년、1년후료효.결과:량자근관공작장도측정차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),PROPEXⅡ근관측량의전측법보편비X선법요단(P<0.05),단근관치료충전후료효차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론:PROPEXⅡ근관측량의림상응용준학、쾌속、령민,근충후치료효과교호.
Objective To study PROPEXⅡroot canal measuring instrument in the determination of the working length of the tooth root canal treatment,its accuracy,sensitivity,and comparison with the x-ray method to judge the merits and effects after root filling.Methods Electrical measurement method using American Dentsply company PROPEXⅡroot tube measuring instrument canal length measurement,X-line method using German sirona company heliodent vario X line machine X-ray film for root canal working length measurement differences contrast,parallel Protaper nickel titanium machine expansion,using The Protaper matching the special gutta percha the BL hot gutta-percha filling machine,France must orchid root canal sealers for root canal filling,observed one month,six months,one year after the efficacy.Results Both root canal working length determination of the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05),PROPEXⅡroot canal measuring instrument electric measurement generally than X-ray method to short(P<0.05),but the curative effect of root canal therapy after filling the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion The clinical application of PROPEXⅡroot canal measuring instrument is accurate,rapid,sensitive,root charge and after treatment is better.