吉林医学
吉林醫學
길림의학
JILIN MEDICAL JOURANL
2013年
8期
1447-1448
,共2页
剖宫产%术后%再次妊娠%分娩方式
剖宮產%術後%再次妊娠%分娩方式
부궁산%술후%재차임신%분면방식
Cesarean section%Postoperative%Pregnancy%Delivery mode
目的:探讨剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择.方法:研究选择的对象共200例,均为剖宫产术后再次妊娠者,分为经阴道分娩50例(A组),再次剖宫产150例(B组).随机抽取同期收治的非瘢痕子宫阴道分娩50例(C组),与首次剖宫产分娩150(D组).将A组与C组对照,B组与D组对照.并对比A组、B组分娩结局.结果:200例患者中,试产成功率为72.5%;直接行剖宫产术占65.5%.A组与B组比较,产后出血量、平均住院费用、平均住院时间均呈较低水平,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).B组和D组比较,产后出血量、平均住院费用、平均住院时间均呈较高水平,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).A组与C组比较,产后出血量、住院费用、平均住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式选择中,直接剖宫产并非绝对指征,分析患者特点,与试产条件符合者,可规范操作,在严密监护下实施阴道试产,以降低剖宫产率,避免远期并发症,提高分娩质量.
目的:探討剖宮產術後再次妊娠分娩方式的選擇.方法:研究選擇的對象共200例,均為剖宮產術後再次妊娠者,分為經陰道分娩50例(A組),再次剖宮產150例(B組).隨機抽取同期收治的非瘢痕子宮陰道分娩50例(C組),與首次剖宮產分娩150(D組).將A組與C組對照,B組與D組對照.併對比A組、B組分娩結跼.結果:200例患者中,試產成功率為72.5%;直接行剖宮產術佔65.5%.A組與B組比較,產後齣血量、平均住院費用、平均住院時間均呈較低水平,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).B組和D組比較,產後齣血量、平均住院費用、平均住院時間均呈較高水平,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).A組與C組比較,產後齣血量、住院費用、平均住院時間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論:剖宮產術後再次妊娠分娩方式選擇中,直接剖宮產併非絕對指徵,分析患者特點,與試產條件符閤者,可規範操作,在嚴密鑑護下實施陰道試產,以降低剖宮產率,避免遠期併髮癥,提高分娩質量.
목적:탐토부궁산술후재차임신분면방식적선택.방법:연구선택적대상공200례,균위부궁산술후재차임신자,분위경음도분면50례(A조),재차부궁산150례(B조).수궤추취동기수치적비반흔자궁음도분면50례(C조),여수차부궁산분면150(D조).장A조여C조대조,B조여D조대조.병대비A조、B조분면결국.결과:200례환자중,시산성공솔위72.5%;직접행부궁산술점65.5%.A조여B조비교,산후출혈량、평균주원비용、평균주원시간균정교저수평,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).B조화D조비교,산후출혈량、평균주원비용、평균주원시간균정교고수평,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).A조여C조비교,산후출혈량、주원비용、평균주원시간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론:부궁산술후재차임신분면방식선택중,직접부궁산병비절대지정,분석환자특점,여시산조건부합자,가규범조작,재엄밀감호하실시음도시산,이강저부궁산솔,피면원기병발증,제고분면질량.
Objective To investigate the pregnancies after cesarean section selection.Methods The object of this study is to choose a total of 200 patients,both after cesarean section pregnancy,divided into vaginal delivery in 50 cases(group A),cesarean section in 150 cases(group B).50 cases of non scar uterus vaginal delivery were randomly selected(group C),and the first cesarean section 150(group D).The A group and C group,B group and D group.Compared with group A,group B delivery outcome.Results Of the 200 patients,the success rate of labor was 72.5%;cesarean delivery directly accounted for 65.5%.Comparison between A group and B group,the amount of postpartum hemorrhage,the average hospitalization expenses,the average hospitalization time was low,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).B group and D group,the amount of postpartum hemorrhage,the average hospitalization expenses,the average hospitalization days were higher,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Comparison between A group and C group,the amount of postpartum bleeding,hospitalization expenses,the average hospitalization days had no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion Pregnancy after cesarean section delivery mode selection,direct cesarean section is not the absolute indications,analysis of patient characteristics,and production conditions,can regulate the operation,the implementation of vaginal delivery in intensive care,in order to reduce the rate of cesarean section,avoid long-term complications,improve the quality of delivery.