CAJ | 학술논문

要:后保管模式发端于20世纪80年代对来源原则的“重新发现”.这种发现奠基于20世纪以来来源概念的持续演进,它非传统概念的再现,而是定格在“形成文件的业务活动”上.特里?库克等学者更以后现代主义哲学为武器,将其提升为“概念来源”或“后现代来源”.以其与我国学者提出的“广义来源观”进行比较研究,可以发现:尽管两者理论基础不同却殊途同归,本质上完全相同;不同点则在于“后现代来源观”的描述,更加强调其虚拟性、动态性和复杂性;“广义来源观”的描述则比较简洁,更注意其实用性,然而这也进一步导致了两者间其他的一些歧异.
요:후보관모식발단우20세기80년대대래원원칙적“중신발현”.저충발현전기우20세기이래래원개념적지속연진,타비전통개념적재현,이시정격재“형성문건적업무활동”상.특리?고극등학자경이후현대주의철학위무기,장기제승위“개념래원”혹“후현대래원”.이기여아국학자제출적“엄의래원관”진행비교연구,가이발현:진관량자이론기출불동각수도동귀,본질상완전상동;불동점칙재우“후현대래원관”적묘술,경가강조기허의성、동태성화복잡성;“엄의래원관”적묘술칙비교간길,경주의기실용성,연이저야진일보도치료량자간기타적일사기이.
@@@@?“Post-custody Mode”originated from the“rediscovery”for the Principle of Provenance in the 1980’s, which was based on constant evolution of Provenance concept since 20th century. This rediscovery was not representation of traditional concept, yet put a frame on “the business transactions”where the records are produced. Some scholars, such as Terry Cook, promoted it to “Conceptual Provenance” or “Postmodern Provenance”, based on the postmodernism philosophy. If a comparison happened between“Postmodern Provenance”and“Generalized Provenance Concept”(which was created by us, Chinese scholars in 1988), we could find that the exactly same in nature existed in both concepts although they have different theory base;And we can also find that the difference is on description ways:the former emphasized on virtual, dynamics, complexity, but the latter laid stress on materiality, practicality. It is the different description ways led to further diverge in other aspect between two concepts.