常熟理工学院学报
常熟理工學院學報
상숙리공학원학보
JOURNAL OF CHANGSHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
2013年
2期
118-121
,共4页
TCP%UDP%传输层%局域网
TCP%UDP%傳輸層%跼域網
TCP%UDP%전수층%국역망
transmission control protocol%user datagram protocol%transport layer%local area network
传输层上有两个重要协议,一个无连接的UDP协议和一个面向连接的TCP协议.两种协议各有特点和优势,可以用于不同坏境的应用.本文通过NS-2对TCP和UDP的性能参数进行了详细的对比和分析,得到如下结论:UDP更适合于对传输延迟敏感的应用,TCP则适合于对可靠性具有高要求的应用.
傳輸層上有兩箇重要協議,一箇無連接的UDP協議和一箇麵嚮連接的TCP協議.兩種協議各有特點和優勢,可以用于不同壞境的應用.本文通過NS-2對TCP和UDP的性能參數進行瞭詳細的對比和分析,得到如下結論:UDP更適閤于對傳輸延遲敏感的應用,TCP則適閤于對可靠性具有高要求的應用.
전수층상유량개중요협의,일개무련접적UDP협의화일개면향련접적TCP협의.량충협의각유특점화우세,가이용우불동배경적응용.본문통과NS-2대TCP화UDP적성능삼수진행료상세적대비화분석,득도여하결론:UDP경괄합우대전수연지민감적응용,TCP칙괄합우대가고성구유고요구적응용.
There are two important protocols in the transport layer. One is connectionless UDP, and the other is connection-oriented TCP. Due to different characteristics and advantages, these two protocols are suitable for dif?ferent applications. Therefore, this paper uses NS-2 to evaluate these two protocols and compares their perfor?mance parameters. Based on the data results, it can be seen that UDP is suitable for the delay-sensitive applica?tions and that TCP is suitable for reliable applications.
