当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2013年
12期
64-65
,共2页
腹腔镜%输卵管性不孕症%疗效
腹腔鏡%輸卵管性不孕癥%療效
복강경%수란관성불잉증%료효
Laparoscopy%Tubal infertility%Efficacy
目的探讨腹腔镜下治疗输卵管性不孕症的临床效果.方法选取广东龙川县妇幼保健院于2010年3月~2011年9月收治的83例输卵管性不孕患者为研究对象,将其随机分为观察组42例和对照组41例,观察组采用腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组采用传统开腹手术治疗.将两组患者的手术时间、肠道排气时间、术后住院时间以及宫内妊娠情况进行统计分析.结果观察组患者手术时间、肠道排气时间、术后住院时间均短于对照组,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组患者术后6个月发生宫内妊娠率(40.0%)与对照组(24.4%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者术后12个月发生宫内妊娠率(52.4%)与对照组(29.3%)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论应用腹腔镜治疗输卵管性不孕的临床优势明显,值得进一步研究及应用.
目的探討腹腔鏡下治療輸卵管性不孕癥的臨床效果.方法選取廣東龍川縣婦幼保健院于2010年3月~2011年9月收治的83例輸卵管性不孕患者為研究對象,將其隨機分為觀察組42例和對照組41例,觀察組採用腹腔鏡手術治療,對照組採用傳統開腹手術治療.將兩組患者的手術時間、腸道排氣時間、術後住院時間以及宮內妊娠情況進行統計分析.結果觀察組患者手術時間、腸道排氣時間、術後住院時間均短于對照組,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).觀察組患者術後6箇月髮生宮內妊娠率(40.0%)與對照組(24.4%)比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);觀察組患者術後12箇月髮生宮內妊娠率(52.4%)與對照組(29.3%)比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論應用腹腔鏡治療輸卵管性不孕的臨床優勢明顯,值得進一步研究及應用.
목적탐토복강경하치료수란관성불잉증적림상효과.방법선취엄동룡천현부유보건원우2010년3월~2011년9월수치적83례수란관성불잉환자위연구대상,장기수궤분위관찰조42례화대조조41례,관찰조채용복강경수술치료,대조조채용전통개복수술치료.장량조환자적수술시간、장도배기시간、술후주원시간이급궁내임신정황진행통계분석.결과관찰조환자수술시간、장도배기시간、술후주원시간균단우대조조,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).관찰조환자술후6개월발생궁내임신솔(40.0%)여대조조(24.4%)비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);관찰조환자술후12개월발생궁내임신솔(52.4%)여대조조(29.3%)비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론응용복강경치료수란관성불잉적림상우세명현,치득진일보연구급응용.
@@@@Objective To study the clinical effects of laparoscopic tubal infertility. Methods 83 cases admitted to our hospital from March 2010 to September 2011 tubal infertility patients were randomLy divided into 42 cases of the observation group and the control group of 41 patients. The observation group was used laparoscopic surgery, the control group was used traditional open surgery. Statistically analyzed the operation time of the two groups, intestinal exhaust time, postoperative hospital stay, and intrauterine pregnancy situation. Results The operation time of the observation group patients, intestinal exhaust time, postoperative hospital stay were less than that of the control group, the two groups have a significant difference (P<0.05). The observation group patients six months after intrauterine pregnancy rate (40.0%) and the control group (24.4%), the difference was not statistically significant difference (P>0.05);intrauterine pregnancy rate in patients after 12 months of observation group (52.4%) and the control group (29.3%), the difference was statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic treatment of tubal infertility obvious clinical advantages deserve further study and application.