中国组织工程研究
中國組織工程研究
중국조직공정연구
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
2013年
8期
1398-1403
,共6页
聂二民%陈霞云%张春元%姜瑞%夏银花
聶二民%陳霞雲%張春元%薑瑞%夏銀花
섭이민%진하운%장춘원%강서%하은화
生物材料%组织工程口腔材料%氢氧化钙糊剂%Vitapex%Metapex%氢氧化钙粉剂%根尖诱导成形术%诱导周期%诱导效果%省级基金
生物材料%組織工程口腔材料%氫氧化鈣糊劑%Vitapex%Metapex%氫氧化鈣粉劑%根尖誘導成形術%誘導週期%誘導效果%省級基金
생물재료%조직공정구강재료%경양화개호제%Vitapex%Metapex%경양화개분제%근첨유도성형술%유도주기%유도효과%성급기금
biomaterials%tissue engineering oral materials%calcium hydroxide cataplasm%Vitapex%Metapex%calcium hydroxide powder%apexification%induction cycle%inductive efficacy%provincial grants-supported paper
背景:氢氧化钙制剂在诱导畸形中央尖患牙根尖封闭中取得了较满意的临床效果.目的:对比4种不同氢氧化钙制剂诱导畸形中央尖患牙根尖封闭的临床效果.方法:选择因畸形中央尖引起的根尖周病变患者127例,分别采用 Vitapex 糊剂(n=31)、Metapex 糊剂(n=32)、氢氧化钙糊剂(n=34)及氢氧化钙粉剂(n=30)行根尖诱导,术后第1,3,6,12,24个月拍摄 X射线片观察根尖状况.结果与结论:①诱导周期:除 Vitapex 糊剂组和 Metapex 糊剂组差异无显著性意义外,其余每两组诱导周期之间差异均有非常显著性意义(P <0.001).②诱导效果:Vitapex 糊剂组、Metapex 糊剂组、氢氧化钙糊剂组诱导成功率均高于氢氧化钙粉剂组(P <0.05),但前3组组间比较差异无显著性意义.表明 Vitapex 糊剂、Metapex 糊剂和氢氧化钙糊剂具有良好的根尖诱导作用,且 Vitapex 糊剂和 Metapex 糊剂的诱导周期较短.
揹景:氫氧化鈣製劑在誘導畸形中央尖患牙根尖封閉中取得瞭較滿意的臨床效果.目的:對比4種不同氫氧化鈣製劑誘導畸形中央尖患牙根尖封閉的臨床效果.方法:選擇因畸形中央尖引起的根尖週病變患者127例,分彆採用 Vitapex 糊劑(n=31)、Metapex 糊劑(n=32)、氫氧化鈣糊劑(n=34)及氫氧化鈣粉劑(n=30)行根尖誘導,術後第1,3,6,12,24箇月拍攝 X射線片觀察根尖狀況.結果與結論:①誘導週期:除 Vitapex 糊劑組和 Metapex 糊劑組差異無顯著性意義外,其餘每兩組誘導週期之間差異均有非常顯著性意義(P <0.001).②誘導效果:Vitapex 糊劑組、Metapex 糊劑組、氫氧化鈣糊劑組誘導成功率均高于氫氧化鈣粉劑組(P <0.05),但前3組組間比較差異無顯著性意義.錶明 Vitapex 糊劑、Metapex 糊劑和氫氧化鈣糊劑具有良好的根尖誘導作用,且 Vitapex 糊劑和 Metapex 糊劑的誘導週期較短.
배경:경양화개제제재유도기형중앙첨환아근첨봉폐중취득료교만의적림상효과.목적:대비4충불동경양화개제제유도기형중앙첨환아근첨봉폐적림상효과.방법:선택인기형중앙첨인기적근첨주병변환자127례,분별채용 Vitapex 호제(n=31)、Metapex 호제(n=32)、경양화개호제(n=34)급경양화개분제(n=30)행근첨유도,술후제1,3,6,12,24개월박섭 X사선편관찰근첨상황.결과여결론:①유도주기:제 Vitapex 호제조화 Metapex 호제조차이무현저성의의외,기여매량조유도주기지간차이균유비상현저성의의(P <0.001).②유도효과:Vitapex 호제조、Metapex 호제조、경양화개호제조유도성공솔균고우경양화개분제조(P <0.05),단전3조조간비교차이무현저성의의.표명 Vitapex 호제、Metapex 호제화경양화개호제구유량호적근첨유도작용,차 Vitapex 호제화 Metapex 호제적유도주기교단.
@@@@BACKGROUND: Great achievements of calcium hydroxide which is used to induce the apical seal have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in clinical efficacy of apexification with four kinds of calcium hydroxide preparations. METHODS: Total y 127 patients with periapical lesions for abnormal central cusp were selected and underwent the apexification respectively with the Vitapex (n=31), the Metapex (n=32), the calcium hydroxide cataplasm (n=34) and the calcium hydroxide powder (n=30). X-ray observation of the tooth apex was made at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after operation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Induction cycle: There was a significant difference between groups (P <0.001), except for the Vitapex group and Metapex group. (2) Induction effect: The success rates in three groups of Vitapex, Metapex and calcium hydroxide cataplasm were higher than that in the group of calcium hydroxide powder (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the first three groups. There was a good root induction in three groups of Vitapex, Metapex and calcium hydroxide cataplasm, and the induction cycle was shorter in Vitapex and Metapex groups.