中国组织工程研究
中國組織工程研究
중국조직공정연구
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
2013年
8期
1513-1520
,共8页
生物材料%生物材料学术探讨%湿性敷料%干性敷料%Ⅱ度烧伤%创面愈合%疼痛%水凝胶%藻酸盐%银离子%泡沫敷料%凡士林纱布
生物材料%生物材料學術探討%濕性敷料%榦性敷料%Ⅱ度燒傷%創麵愈閤%疼痛%水凝膠%藻痠鹽%銀離子%泡沫敷料%凡士林紗佈
생물재료%생물재료학술탐토%습성부료%간성부료%Ⅱ도소상%창면유합%동통%수응효%조산염%은리자%포말부료%범사림사포
biomaterials%academic discussion of biomaterials%synthetic dressing%dry dressings%burns%wound healing%pain%hydrogel%alginate%silver ions%foam dressing%vaseline gauze
背景:已有基础实验证明,伤口在湿性环境下的愈合效果优于干性环境,湿性敷料的研究是皮肤创面愈合研究的重点.目的:观察湿性敷料对皮肤Ⅱ度烧伤创面的治疗效果.方法:选取在海南省人民医院门诊接受治疗的38例Ⅱ度烧伤患者,采用自身对照法将创面分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用湿性敷料覆盖治疗烧伤创面,对照组采用碘伏纱布或凡士林纱布覆盖,治疗后分别观察两种不同处理方法对创面的愈合效果及对疼痛程度的影响.结果与结论:所有患者均纳入结果分析,治疗组患者烧伤创面的平均愈合时间为(9.8±3.1) d,对照组创面平均愈合时间为(13.1±2.2) d,两者比较差异有显著性意义(P <0.01).治疗组创面疼痛程度明显低于对照组(P <0.01).使用湿性敷料(美皮贴或美皮康)治疗Ⅱ度烧伤,可以使创面愈合时间缩短,创面疼痛程度明显降低.
揹景:已有基礎實驗證明,傷口在濕性環境下的愈閤效果優于榦性環境,濕性敷料的研究是皮膚創麵愈閤研究的重點.目的:觀察濕性敷料對皮膚Ⅱ度燒傷創麵的治療效果.方法:選取在海南省人民醫院門診接受治療的38例Ⅱ度燒傷患者,採用自身對照法將創麵分為治療組和對照組,治療組採用濕性敷料覆蓋治療燒傷創麵,對照組採用碘伏紗佈或凡士林紗佈覆蓋,治療後分彆觀察兩種不同處理方法對創麵的愈閤效果及對疼痛程度的影響.結果與結論:所有患者均納入結果分析,治療組患者燒傷創麵的平均愈閤時間為(9.8±3.1) d,對照組創麵平均愈閤時間為(13.1±2.2) d,兩者比較差異有顯著性意義(P <0.01).治療組創麵疼痛程度明顯低于對照組(P <0.01).使用濕性敷料(美皮貼或美皮康)治療Ⅱ度燒傷,可以使創麵愈閤時間縮短,創麵疼痛程度明顯降低.
배경:이유기출실험증명,상구재습성배경하적유합효과우우간성배경,습성부료적연구시피부창면유합연구적중점.목적:관찰습성부료대피부Ⅱ도소상창면적치료효과.방법:선취재해남성인민의원문진접수치료적38례Ⅱ도소상환자,채용자신대조법장창면분위치료조화대조조,치료조채용습성부료복개치료소상창면,대조조채용전복사포혹범사림사포복개,치료후분별관찰량충불동처리방법대창면적유합효과급대동통정도적영향.결과여결론:소유환자균납입결과분석,치료조환자소상창면적평균유합시간위(9.8±3.1) d,대조조창면평균유합시간위(13.1±2.2) d,량자비교차이유현저성의의(P <0.01).치료조창면동통정도명현저우대조조(P <0.01).사용습성부료(미피첩혹미피강)치료Ⅱ도소상,가이사창면유합시간축단,창면동통정도명현강저.
@@@@BACKGROUND: Some basic experiments have shown that wound healing in the moist environment is better than that in the dry environment, and the research on the synthetic dressing is important for skin wound healing. OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of synthetic dressing on the treatment of skin Ⅱ degree burns. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with skin Outpatient, Hainan General Hospital. The wounds were divided into treatment group and control group. The patients in the treatment group were treated with synthetic dressing to cover the burn wound, and the patients in the control group were treated with Iodophor gauze or Vaseline gauze. The effects of these methods on the wound healing and pain were observed after treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Al the patients were included in final analysis. The average wound healing time of the treatment group was (9.8±3.1) days, and the average wound healing time of the control group was (13.1±2.2) days, and there was significant difference in the average healing time between two groups (P < 0.01);the degree of the pain of wound in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.01). The application of synthetic dressing (Mepiform or M?lnlycke) for the treatment of skin the wound healing time and reduce the wound pain markedly.
