CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效.方法将2009年5月~2012年5月在我院治疗的232例腹股沟疝患者随机分为两组,治疗组116例患者采用无张力疝修补术,对照组116例患者采用传统疝修补术,比较两组患者的临床疗效及复发情况.结果治疗组患者术后绝对卧床时间、疼痛时间及住院时间均短于对照组,且复发率及并发症的发生率明显低于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论与传统手术相比无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝临床疗效显著,术后患者痛苦少、恢复快、复发率低且并发症少,是治疗腹股沟疝理想的方法.
목적탐토무장력산수보술치료복고구산적림상료효.방법장2009년5월~2012년5월재아원치료적232례복고구산환자수궤분위량조,치료조116례환자채용무장력산수보술,대조조116례환자채용전통산수보술,비교량조환자적림상료효급복발정황.결과치료조환자술후절대와상시간、동통시간급주원시간균단우대조조,차복발솔급병발증적발생솔명현저우대조조,량조비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론여전통수술상비무장력산수보술치료복고구산림상료효현저,술후환자통고소、회복쾌、복발솔저차병발증소,시치료복고구산이상적방법.
Objective To explore the diagnosis and treatment without tension hernia repair of inguinal hernia clinical curative effect. Methods Wil be in May 2009 to May 2012 in our hospital diagnosis and treatment of 232 patients with inguinal hernia were randomly divided into two groups, treatment group, 116 cases of patients without tension hernia repair, the control group 116 cases were treated by traditional hernia repair, compared two groups of clinical curative effect and the relapse. Results Treatment group of patients in bed time, postoperative pain time and hospital stay were shorter than the control group, and the recurrence rate and complication rate is lower than the control group, two groups of comparisons difference was statisticaly significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional surgery without tension hernia repair treatment of inguinal hernia clinical curative effect is distinct, postoperatively, less pain, quick recovery, low recurrence rate and fewer complications, is the ideal method of treatment of inguinal hernia.