化工进展
化工進展
화공진전
CHEMICAL INDUSTRY AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS
2013年
5期
1157-1162
,共6页
张兰河%宋达%杨日光%张德义
張蘭河%宋達%楊日光%張德義
장란하%송체%양일광%장덕의
硫化氢%生物滴滤塔%冲击负荷%压力损失
硫化氫%生物滴濾塔%遲擊負荷%壓力損失
류화경%생물적려탑%충격부하%압력손실
hydrogen sulfide%bio-trickling filter%shock loading%pressure drop
为了解决恶臭污染问题,采用接种辫硫杆菌ZG11的生物滴滤塔A与接种活性污泥的生物滴滤塔B对硫化氢气体进行了4个多月的脱臭实验研究,主要考察了进气浓度、冲击负荷和氮利用率对硫化氢去除率的影响以及实验前后压力损失的变化.结果表明:当硫化氢进气浓度低于600 mg/m3,即进气负荷Nv低于113.33 g/(m3·h)时,滴滤塔A的去除率接近100%.当进气浓度低于750 mg/m3,即Nv低于133.33 g/(m3·h)时,滴滤塔B的去除率接近100%.当进气流量为8 m3/h时,滴滤塔A与B的压力损失分别为176.4 Pa/m和313.6 Pa/m.与滴滤塔A相比,滴滤塔B启动快,去除速率高,抗冲击负荷能力强,但压力损失大,受氮源的影响较大.
為瞭解決噁臭汙染問題,採用接種辮硫桿菌ZG11的生物滴濾塔A與接種活性汙泥的生物滴濾塔B對硫化氫氣體進行瞭4箇多月的脫臭實驗研究,主要攷察瞭進氣濃度、遲擊負荷和氮利用率對硫化氫去除率的影響以及實驗前後壓力損失的變化.結果錶明:噹硫化氫進氣濃度低于600 mg/m3,即進氣負荷Nv低于113.33 g/(m3·h)時,滴濾塔A的去除率接近100%.噹進氣濃度低于750 mg/m3,即Nv低于133.33 g/(m3·h)時,滴濾塔B的去除率接近100%.噹進氣流量為8 m3/h時,滴濾塔A與B的壓力損失分彆為176.4 Pa/m和313.6 Pa/m.與滴濾塔A相比,滴濾塔B啟動快,去除速率高,抗遲擊負荷能力彊,但壓力損失大,受氮源的影響較大.
위료해결악취오염문제,채용접충변류간균ZG11적생물적려탑A여접충활성오니적생물적려탑B대류화경기체진행료4개다월적탈취실험연구,주요고찰료진기농도、충격부하화담이용솔대류화경거제솔적영향이급실험전후압력손실적변화.결과표명:당류화경진기농도저우600 mg/m3,즉진기부하Nv저우113.33 g/(m3·h)시,적려탑A적거제솔접근100%.당진기농도저우750 mg/m3,즉Nv저우133.33 g/(m3·h)시,적려탑B적거제솔접근100%.당진기류량위8 m3/h시,적려탑A여B적압력손실분별위176.4 Pa/m화313.6 Pa/m.여적려탑A상비,적려탑B계동쾌,거제속솔고,항충격부하능력강,단압력손실대,수담원적영향교대.
The deodorization experiment of hydrogen sulfide(H2S)was carried out continuously using bio-trickling filter A inoculating sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and bio-trickling filter B inoculating activated sludge in order to solve the odor pollution. The two bioreactors were operated for more than four months to investigate the effects of inlet concentration,shock loading and consuming quantity of nitrogen on the removal efficiency of H2S. Pressure drops of the bio-trickling filters were also compared before and after the experiment. The results suggested that removal efficiency of the bio-trickling filter A was nearly 100%when inlet concentration of H2S was lower than 600 mg/m3 and the corresponding inlet loading was lower than 113.33 g/(m3·h). Removal efficiency of the bio-trickling filter B was nearly 100% when inlet concentration of H2S was lower than 750 mg/m3 and the corresponding inlet loading was lower than 133.33 g/(m3·h). Pressure drops of the bio-trickling filter A and B were respectively 176.4 Pa/m and 313.6 Pa/m at 8 m3/h of gas flow rate. Compared with bio-trickling filter A,the bio-trickling filter B performed a relatively rapid startup,relatively high removal efficiency and ability to resist shock-loading. However,the bio-trickling filter B had a relatively high pressure drop and its removal efficiency was easily influenced by nitrogen source.