CAJ | 학술논문

为了探讨不同覆盖耕作方式对农田土壤物理性状及作物产量的影响,该试验研究了免耕、常规2种耕作方式和4种留茬高度的玉米秸秆还田处理,对麦-玉两熟农田土壤含水率、容重、孔隙度以及作物产量的影响.结果表明:在0~40 cm土层内,秸秆还田的集雨和保水效果显著,免耕留茬0.5 m还田处理的含水率比免耕无覆盖处理增加了15.95%.秸秆还田量对0~40 cm内土壤贮水量的影响不同.耕作措施显著影响了土壤容重,小麦播种前常规留茬1 m还田、常规全量还田处理容重低至1.0 g/cm3左右.秸秆还田能增加土壤总孔隙度、降低毛管与非毛管孔隙度的比值.单一免耕处理降低了作物产量,而免耕覆盖能增产,其留茬1 m还田处理比无还田处理增产22.44%,比常规留茬0.5 m还田处理高3.64%.因此,免耕留茬1 m还田处理在改善农田土壤物理性状和增加作物产量方面显著,该研究可为农田管理过程中耕作措施和秸秆还田量的选择提供参考依据.
위료탐토불동복개경작방식대농전토양물이성상급작물산량적영향,해시험연구료면경、상규2충경작방식화4충류치고도적옥미갈간환전처리,대맥-옥량숙농전토양함수솔、용중、공극도이급작물산량적영향.결과표명:재0~40 cm토층내,갈간환전적집우화보수효과현저,면경류치0.5 m환전처리적함수솔비면경무복개처리증가료15.95%.갈간환전량대0~40 cm내토양저수량적영향불동.경작조시현저영향료토양용중,소맥파충전상규류치1 m환전、상규전량환전처리용중저지1.0 g/cm3좌우.갈간환전능증가토양총공극도、강저모관여비모관공극도적비치.단일면경처리강저료작물산량,이면경복개능증산,기류치1 m환전처리비무환전처리증산22.44%,비상규류치0.5 m환전처리고3.64%.인차,면경류치1 m환전처리재개선농전토양물이성상화증가작물산량방면현저,해연구가위농전관리과정중경작조시화갈간환전량적선택제공삼고의거.
Soil physical properties and crop productivity are general affected by different management methods of farmland, such as different tillage systems and crop straw managements. The objective of this study were to measure physical properties of soil including soil water content, soil water storage, soil bulk density and soil porosity (capillary porosity and non-capillary porosity) under a long-term tillage and straw management experiment system in the North China Plain, and the crop productivity of a wheat-maize cropping system was also analyzed (2010-2012). The study was assessed on 10 year field study with a split-plot design, which involved two tillage methods of conventional tillage (C) and zero tillage (Z) and four levels of straw utilization systems at straw returning (P), stubble returning of 1m height (-1), stubble returning of 0.5 m height (-0.5) and straw removal (A). The innovation of this study investigated effects of 4 different stubble heights returning on soil physical properties and crop yields. The result showed that, the soil water content in the 0-40 cm soil layer under treatments of conventional tillage and zero tillage increased with the amounts of straw returning increasing, so straw returning could increase the soil water content, Z-0.5 was more than 15.95% to AZ. In comparison to the conventional tillage, no tillage method combination with straw could improve the soil moisture, so zero tillage could improve the soil water content. In 0-40 cm soil layer, amounts of straw returning affected variation of soil water storage in the two stages, in the planting stage of wheat, soil water storage under treatments of conventional tillage and zero tillage gradually reduced with the amounts of straw returning increasing, but in the maturating stage of wheat, soil water storage under treatments of conventional tillage and zero tillage gradually increased with the amounts of straw returning increasing. In the planting stage of wheat, tillage methods could significantly affected soil bulk density, the treatment of stubble 1 meter returning had the lower soil bulk density (p<0.05). However, soil bulk density could self-increasing with the times, eventually there was no significant difference of soil bulk density under treatments of conventional tillage and zero tillage in the maturating stage of wheat. Straw returning also increased the soil porosity, reduced the ratio of capillary porosity and non-capillary porosity in the planting stage of wheat. Zero tillage treatment without straw returning reduced wheat and maize yields, but the zero tillage method combination with straw could increase total yields of wheat and maize, and the best treatment to increase yields was 1 m stubble returning treatment, it increased 22.44% than zero tillage without straw returning. Therefore, the treatment of stubble 1 m returning had conducive to improve soil physical properties and crop productivity.