心理学报
心理學報
심이학보
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
2013年
4期
446-452
,共7页
张瑜%郑希付%黄珊珊%李悦%杜晓芬%周薇
張瑜%鄭希付%黃珊珊%李悅%杜曉芬%週薇
장유%정희부%황산산%리열%두효분%주미
特质焦虑%返回抑制%情绪线索%线索-靶子任务
特質焦慮%返迴抑製%情緒線索%線索-靶子任務
특질초필%반회억제%정서선색%선색-파자임무
trait anxiety%inhibition of return%emotional cues%cue-target task
焦虑与注意偏向的研究是近年来情绪与认知领域的热点.为探讨特质焦虑个体的注意偏向特点及其返回抑制能力是否受不同线索的调节,采用特质焦虑量表筛选高特质焦虑大学生29名,低特质焦虑大学生28名完成线索-靶子任务.要求被试在提示线索消失后,对位置进行快而准地辨别反应,分别探索中性和情绪性提示线索下被试的返回抑制.结果发现:(1)在中性线索条件下,高焦虑个体平均反应时慢于低焦虑个体.(2)在情绪线索条件下,高焦虑个体在负性线索下的反应时小于在正性线索下的反应时;高、低焦虑个体在各种 SOA条件下均出现了返回抑制,但各组返回抑制量受到情绪线索的调节:在正性情绪线索条件下,两组返回抑制量没有显著差异;在负性情绪线索下,高焦虑个体返回抑制量显著小于低焦虑个体.这表明,(1)焦虑个体的注意偏向受到刺激信息的影响:只对负性情绪线索出现注意警觉;(2)只有在涉及负性情绪信息时高、低焦虑个体返回抑制能力才有差异,高焦虑个体存在对负性情绪线索的抑制困难.
焦慮與註意偏嚮的研究是近年來情緒與認知領域的熱點.為探討特質焦慮箇體的註意偏嚮特點及其返迴抑製能力是否受不同線索的調節,採用特質焦慮量錶篩選高特質焦慮大學生29名,低特質焦慮大學生28名完成線索-靶子任務.要求被試在提示線索消失後,對位置進行快而準地辨彆反應,分彆探索中性和情緒性提示線索下被試的返迴抑製.結果髮現:(1)在中性線索條件下,高焦慮箇體平均反應時慢于低焦慮箇體.(2)在情緒線索條件下,高焦慮箇體在負性線索下的反應時小于在正性線索下的反應時;高、低焦慮箇體在各種 SOA條件下均齣現瞭返迴抑製,但各組返迴抑製量受到情緒線索的調節:在正性情緒線索條件下,兩組返迴抑製量沒有顯著差異;在負性情緒線索下,高焦慮箇體返迴抑製量顯著小于低焦慮箇體.這錶明,(1)焦慮箇體的註意偏嚮受到刺激信息的影響:隻對負性情緒線索齣現註意警覺;(2)隻有在涉及負性情緒信息時高、低焦慮箇體返迴抑製能力纔有差異,高焦慮箇體存在對負性情緒線索的抑製睏難.
초필여주의편향적연구시근년래정서여인지영역적열점.위탐토특질초필개체적주의편향특점급기반회억제능력시부수불동선색적조절,채용특질초필량표사선고특질초필대학생29명,저특질초필대학생28명완성선색-파자임무.요구피시재제시선색소실후,대위치진행쾌이준지변별반응,분별탐색중성화정서성제시선색하피시적반회억제.결과발현:(1)재중성선색조건하,고초필개체평균반응시만우저초필개체.(2)재정서선색조건하,고초필개체재부성선색하적반응시소우재정성선색하적반응시;고、저초필개체재각충 SOA조건하균출현료반회억제,단각조반회억제량수도정서선색적조절:재정성정서선색조건하,량조반회억제량몰유현저차이;재부성정서선색하,고초필개체반회억제량현저소우저초필개체.저표명,(1)초필개체적주의편향수도자격신식적영향:지대부성정서선색출현주의경각;(2)지유재섭급부성정서신식시고、저초필개체반회억제능력재유차이,고초필개체존재대부성정서선색적억제곤난.
@@@@Inhibition of return (IOR), as an important part of attention bias, was generally considered as an adaptive mechanism during human evolution. Previous studies on the peculiarities of anxiety individual’s attention mainly focused on the attention orientation and inhibition ability; the effects of the natures of the stimuli on post-orientation inhibition, and the relation between the anxiety individual’s features and attentional bias, are still unclear. In the present study, we will focus on the attention bias of the anxiety group, and try to figure out the possible reasons underlying IOR features by using the cue-target paradigm with different cues. @@@@Traits Anxiety Inventory was used to test the undergraduates before the experiment, and finally twenty-nine undergraduates with high trait anxiety and twenty-eight with low trait anxiety were chosen as participants. In two experiments, participants were instructed to perform a cue-target task as accurately and quickly as possible, which included two kinds of uninformative cues:neutral cognitive cues and emotional face cues. @@@@Experiment 1 suggested that participants of high anxiety reacted more slowly than that of low anxiety under the condition of neutral cognitive cues. Although IOR did not appear in this experiment. Experiment 2 indicated that IOR effect occurred under all SOA levels for both groups, and IOR magnitudes of the two groups were modulated by emotional cues. The two groups showed no significant difference on IOR effect under the condition of positive cues, while IOR effect of the high anxiety group turned out to be much smaller than that of the low anxiety group under the condition of negative cues. @@@@These experiments suggested that only under negative emotional circumstances, groups of different trait anxiety showed different IOR abilities, and particularly, high anxiety group’s IOR ability was impaired, which provided specific information on possible improvement of the anxiety symptoms.