医药前沿
醫藥前沿
의약전연
YIAYAO QIANYAN
2013年
5期
102-103
,共2页
精索静脉曲张%显微外科%腹腔镜%疗效%并发症
精索靜脈麯張%顯微外科%腹腔鏡%療效%併髮癥
정색정맥곡장%현미외과%복강경%료효%병발증
varicocele%microsurgery%laparoscopy%therapeutic effect%complication
目的:比较经显微外科与腹腔镜途径精索静脉结扎术治疗精索静脉曲张的疗效及并发症.方法:将86例精索静脉曲张患者随机分为显微外科精索静脉结扎术组(43例)和腹腔镜精索静脉结扎术组(43例),比较术前、术后3个月的精液质量、术后并发症、术后配偶妊娠率.结果:显微外科组手术时间明显长于腹腔镜组(p <0.05);术后住院天数显微外科组为(3.6±0.7)d,腹腔镜组为(2.8±0.8)d,两组无明显差别;两组术后精子密度、活率、a+b 级精子百分率均较前明显提高(p <0.05),但两组间无统计学差异.配偶妊娠率显微外科组为65.2%,腹腔镜组为62.4%.术后一周内阴囊水肿发生率显微外科组为6.97%,腹腔镜组为9.30%;术后睾丸鞘膜积液发生率显微外科组为0例,腹腔镜组为1例(2.32%);术后复发率均为0例.(p ﹥0.05)结论:与腹腔镜精索静脉结扎术比,显微外科精索静脉结扎术创伤更小,恢复快、麻醉经济、术后并发症少、复发率低,是值得推广的安全有效的术式.
目的:比較經顯微外科與腹腔鏡途徑精索靜脈結扎術治療精索靜脈麯張的療效及併髮癥.方法:將86例精索靜脈麯張患者隨機分為顯微外科精索靜脈結扎術組(43例)和腹腔鏡精索靜脈結扎術組(43例),比較術前、術後3箇月的精液質量、術後併髮癥、術後配偶妊娠率.結果:顯微外科組手術時間明顯長于腹腔鏡組(p <0.05);術後住院天數顯微外科組為(3.6±0.7)d,腹腔鏡組為(2.8±0.8)d,兩組無明顯差彆;兩組術後精子密度、活率、a+b 級精子百分率均較前明顯提高(p <0.05),但兩組間無統計學差異.配偶妊娠率顯微外科組為65.2%,腹腔鏡組為62.4%.術後一週內陰囊水腫髮生率顯微外科組為6.97%,腹腔鏡組為9.30%;術後睪汍鞘膜積液髮生率顯微外科組為0例,腹腔鏡組為1例(2.32%);術後複髮率均為0例.(p ﹥0.05)結論:與腹腔鏡精索靜脈結扎術比,顯微外科精索靜脈結扎術創傷更小,恢複快、痳醉經濟、術後併髮癥少、複髮率低,是值得推廣的安全有效的術式.
목적:비교경현미외과여복강경도경정색정맥결찰술치료정색정맥곡장적료효급병발증.방법:장86례정색정맥곡장환자수궤분위현미외과정색정맥결찰술조(43례)화복강경정색정맥결찰술조(43례),비교술전、술후3개월적정액질량、술후병발증、술후배우임신솔.결과:현미외과조수술시간명현장우복강경조(p <0.05);술후주원천수현미외과조위(3.6±0.7)d,복강경조위(2.8±0.8)d,량조무명현차별;량조술후정자밀도、활솔、a+b 급정자백분솔균교전명현제고(p <0.05),단량조간무통계학차이.배우임신솔현미외과조위65.2%,복강경조위62.4%.술후일주내음낭수종발생솔현미외과조위6.97%,복강경조위9.30%;술후고환초막적액발생솔현미외과조위0례,복강경조위1례(2.32%);술후복발솔균위0례.(p ﹥0.05)결론:여복강경정색정맥결찰술비,현미외과정색정맥결찰술창상경소,회복쾌、마취경제、술후병발증소、복발솔저,시치득추엄적안전유효적술식.
Objective: To compare the effects and postoperative complications of microscopic varicocelectomy (MV)and laparoscopic varicocelectomy(LV) in the treatment of varicocele. Methods:We assigned 86 varicocele patients to two groups of equalnumber to be treated by MV and LV.We compared the two groups in the semen parameters before and 3 months after surgery,postoperative complications,and pregnancy rates of the patients`wives. Results:The operative time was significantly longer in the MV than in the LV group(p < 0.05).The postoperative hospital stay showed no significant difference between the MV and LV groups(3.2±0.7)d vs (2.8±0.8)d .sperm concentration,sperm motility and the percentage of grade a+b sperm were singnificantly increased in both groups after surgery ( p < 0.05),but with no significant differences between the two. The pregnancy rate was 65.2%in the former and 62.4% in the latter.Postoperative hydrocele occurred in 2cases in the LV,but none in the MV group.There were no statisticaly significant differences in recurrence between the two groups(p﹥ 0.05). Conclusion: MV is superior to LV for its minimal invasiveness, economical anesthesia, faster recovery and lower rates of postoperative complications and recurrence.