中国康复理论与实践
中國康複理論與實踐
중국강복이론여실천
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION THEORY & PRACTICE
2013年
4期
371-374
,共4页
Fugl-Meyer评定法%Wolf运动功能测试%BOX-BLOCK测试%九孔柱测试%上肢%效度
Fugl-Meyer評定法%Wolf運動功能測試%BOX-BLOCK測試%九孔柱測試%上肢%效度
Fugl-Meyer평정법%Wolf운동공능측시%BOX-BLOCK측시%구공주측시%상지%효도
Fugl-Meyer assessment%Wolf motor function test%BOX-BLOCK TEST%Nine-Hole Peg Test%upper extremity%validity
目的分别研究脑卒中偏瘫患者 Wolf 运动功能测试(WMFT)、BOX-BLOCK 测试(BBT)和九孔柱测试这3种量表与Fugl-Meyer上肢运动功能测试(U-FMA)比较的标准效度以及它们之间的相关性.方法由1名经过训练的评定员对21例脑卒中受试者进行 WMFT、BBT、九孔柱测试和 U-FMA 4种评价,每一受试的该4种评价在同一天完成.以 U-FMA 为标准,用 Spearman相关分析分别对WMFT计时、WMFT得分、BBT计数、九孔柱计时进行标准效度检验;并用Spearman相关分析来研究WMFT计时与 WMFT 得分,BBT 计数与 WMFT 得分、九孔柱计时与 WMFT 计时之间的相关性.结果与结论3种量表的标准效度结果:WMFT得分、BBT计数与U-FMA评分相关(P<0.01);九孔柱计时、WMFT计时与U-FMA评分不相关(P>0.05).3种量表间相关性的检测结果:WMFT计时与WMFT得分不相关(P>0.05);BBT计数与WMFT得分相关(P<0.01);九孔柱计时与WMFT计时相关(P<0.01).
目的分彆研究腦卒中偏癱患者 Wolf 運動功能測試(WMFT)、BOX-BLOCK 測試(BBT)和九孔柱測試這3種量錶與Fugl-Meyer上肢運動功能測試(U-FMA)比較的標準效度以及它們之間的相關性.方法由1名經過訓練的評定員對21例腦卒中受試者進行 WMFT、BBT、九孔柱測試和 U-FMA 4種評價,每一受試的該4種評價在同一天完成.以 U-FMA 為標準,用 Spearman相關分析分彆對WMFT計時、WMFT得分、BBT計數、九孔柱計時進行標準效度檢驗;併用Spearman相關分析來研究WMFT計時與 WMFT 得分,BBT 計數與 WMFT 得分、九孔柱計時與 WMFT 計時之間的相關性.結果與結論3種量錶的標準效度結果:WMFT得分、BBT計數與U-FMA評分相關(P<0.01);九孔柱計時、WMFT計時與U-FMA評分不相關(P>0.05).3種量錶間相關性的檢測結果:WMFT計時與WMFT得分不相關(P>0.05);BBT計數與WMFT得分相關(P<0.01);九孔柱計時與WMFT計時相關(P<0.01).
목적분별연구뇌졸중편탄환자 Wolf 운동공능측시(WMFT)、BOX-BLOCK 측시(BBT)화구공주측시저3충량표여Fugl-Meyer상지운동공능측시(U-FMA)비교적표준효도이급타문지간적상관성.방법유1명경과훈련적평정원대21례뇌졸중수시자진행 WMFT、BBT、구공주측시화 U-FMA 4충평개,매일수시적해4충평개재동일천완성.이 U-FMA 위표준,용 Spearman상관분석분별대WMFT계시、WMFT득분、BBT계수、구공주계시진행표준효도검험;병용Spearman상관분석래연구WMFT계시여 WMFT 득분,BBT 계수여 WMFT 득분、구공주계시여 WMFT 계시지간적상관성.결과여결론3충량표적표준효도결과:WMFT득분、BBT계수여U-FMA평분상관(P<0.01);구공주계시、WMFT계시여U-FMA평분불상관(P>0.05).3충량표간상관성적검측결과:WMFT계시여WMFT득분불상관(P>0.05);BBT계수여WMFT득분상관(P<0.01);구공주계시여WMFT계시상관(P<0.01).
Objective To investigate the criterion validity of Wolf motor function test (WMFT), BOX-BLOCK TEST (BBT), Nine-Hole Peg Test for assessing upper limb motor function in stroke patients with hemiplegia, as well as the correlation between them. Methods 21 stroke patients participated in the study. 21 stroke patients were assessed once with WMFT, BBT, Nine-Hole Peg Test and U-FMA by one rater. All the 4 tests were assessed on the same day for each patient. The total time of WMFT, the total score of WMFT, the counts of BBT, the time of Nine-Hole Peg Test and the sore of U-FMA were recorded. The Spearman correlation was used to analyze the criterion validity and the correlation. Results and Conclusion Both the total score of WMFT and the BBT counts correlated with U-FMA score (P<0.01). The time of Nine-Hole Peg Test and the total time of the WMFT were not correlated with U-FMA score (P>0.05). The total time of the WMFT and the total score of the WMFT were not correlated (P>0.05). The BBT counts and the total score of the WMFT were correlated (P<0.01). The time of Nine-Hole Peg Test and the total time of WMFT were correlated (P<0.01).
