中国医药导刊
中國醫藥導刊
중국의약도간
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GUIDE
2013年
4期
720
,共1页
产后出血%预见性护理%常规护理%疗效
產後齣血%預見性護理%常規護理%療效
산후출혈%예견성호리%상규호리%료효
Postpartum hemorrhage%Precautionary measures in nursing%Routine clinical nursing%Efficacy?
目的:比较预见性护理和常规护理干预对产后出血患者的效果.方法:将我院180例产后出血患者随机分为试验组和对照组,每组90例.对照组给予常规护理,试验组在常规护理基础之上增加产前监测、产时监测、病因护理、心理护理和出院指导干预.结果:与对照组相比,试验组产后2h及24h出血量较少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);相关并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);三个产程时间均较对照组短(P<0.05);且住院天数也少于对照组(P<0.05).两组产后出血原因差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:预见性干预护理措施可较为显著地改善产后出血情况,值得在临床护理工作中开展及推广.
目的:比較預見性護理和常規護理榦預對產後齣血患者的效果.方法:將我院180例產後齣血患者隨機分為試驗組和對照組,每組90例.對照組給予常規護理,試驗組在常規護理基礎之上增加產前鑑測、產時鑑測、病因護理、心理護理和齣院指導榦預.結果:與對照組相比,試驗組產後2h及24h齣血量較少,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);相關併髮癥髮生率低于對照組(P<0.05);三箇產程時間均較對照組短(P<0.05);且住院天數也少于對照組(P<0.05).兩組產後齣血原因差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論:預見性榦預護理措施可較為顯著地改善產後齣血情況,值得在臨床護理工作中開展及推廣.
목적:비교예견성호리화상규호리간예대산후출혈환자적효과.방법:장아원180례산후출혈환자수궤분위시험조화대조조,매조90례.대조조급여상규호리,시험조재상규호리기출지상증가산전감측、산시감측、병인호리、심리호리화출원지도간예.결과:여대조조상비,시험조산후2h급24h출혈량교소,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);상관병발증발생솔저우대조조(P<0.05);삼개산정시간균교대조조단(P<0.05);차주원천수야소우대조조(P<0.05).량조산후출혈원인차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론:예견성간예호리조시가교위현저지개선산후출혈정황,치득재림상호리공작중개전급추엄.
@@@@Objective:Compared the clinical effects of precautionary measures in nursing and routine clinical nursing treat the patients of postpartum hemorrhage. Methods: 180 cases of postpartum hemorrhage in our hospital randomly divided into test group and control group according to the prevailing situation of nursing intervention. Each group has 90 cases. Control group treated with conventional care, and test group add antenatal monitoring, intrapartum monitoring, etiology care, psychological care and special Instruction to the patient. Results:The volume of hemorrhage 2 hours and 24 hours after parturition in the test group was less than the controls (P<0.05).The complication rate in test group was lower in test group than controls (P<0.05).The time of three stages of labor in test group were fewer than control group (P<0.05).And the hospital stay in test group was shorter than control group (P<0.05). However, the two groups’ reason of postpartum hemorrhage was no difference (P>0.05). Conclusion:The precautionary measures in nursing are more effective than routine clinical nursing, should be carried out in clinical care.