中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2013年
6期
26-28
,共3页
张志强%郑利群%何希俊%白伟杰%杨楠%黄晓煌%罗卫平
張誌彊%鄭利群%何希俊%白偉傑%楊楠%黃曉煌%囉衛平
장지강%정리군%하희준%백위걸%양남%황효황%라위평
脑卒中%假性球麻痹%吞咽障碍%穴位埋线%电针疗法%吞咽电刺激%吞咽训练
腦卒中%假性毬痳痺%吞嚥障礙%穴位埋線%電針療法%吞嚥電刺激%吞嚥訓練
뇌졸중%가성구마비%탄인장애%혈위매선%전침요법%탄인전자격%탄인훈련
Stroke%Pseudo bulbar palsy%Dysphagia%Acupoint catgut embedding therapy%Electro-acupuncture therapy%Swallowing electrical stimulation therapy%Swallowing training
目的:观察穴位埋线治疗卒中后假性球麻痹吞咽障碍的临床疗效.方法:将符合研究标准的90例合并吞咽障碍的假性球麻痹患者随机分为治疗组(45例)和对照组(45例),两组均给予常规的脑血管病治疗、吞咽训练和吞咽电刺激治疗,治疗组在此基础上给予穴位埋线治疗,对照组给予电针治疗,治疗1个疗程后评价其临床疗效.结果:两组总有效率均为97.78%,两组的总有效率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:穴位埋线和电针治疗卒中后假性球麻痹的临床疗效相当,但穴位埋线只需每2周治疗1次,患者更易于接受.
目的:觀察穴位埋線治療卒中後假性毬痳痺吞嚥障礙的臨床療效.方法:將符閤研究標準的90例閤併吞嚥障礙的假性毬痳痺患者隨機分為治療組(45例)和對照組(45例),兩組均給予常規的腦血管病治療、吞嚥訓練和吞嚥電刺激治療,治療組在此基礎上給予穴位埋線治療,對照組給予電針治療,治療1箇療程後評價其臨床療效.結果:兩組總有效率均為97.78%,兩組的總有效率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論:穴位埋線和電針治療卒中後假性毬痳痺的臨床療效相噹,但穴位埋線隻需每2週治療1次,患者更易于接受.
목적:관찰혈위매선치료졸중후가성구마비탄인장애적림상료효.방법:장부합연구표준적90례합병탄인장애적가성구마비환자수궤분위치료조(45례)화대조조(45례),량조균급여상규적뇌혈관병치료、탄인훈련화탄인전자격치료,치료조재차기출상급여혈위매선치료,대조조급여전침치료,치료1개료정후평개기림상료효.결과:량조총유효솔균위97.78%,량조적총유효솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론:혈위매선화전침치료졸중후가성구마비적림상료효상당,단혈위매선지수매2주치료1차,환자경역우접수.
Objective:To investigate the clinical effects of acupoint catgut embedding therapy for dysphagia from pseudo bulbar palsy. Methods: 90 patients were randomly divided into the treatment group (45 cases)and the control group (45 cases), During the treatment, all patients were applied the routinely treatment equally, swallowing training and swallowing electrical stimulation treatment. Besides, the control group was given electro-acupuncture therapy. The treatment group received acupoint catgut embedding therapy. The clinical efficacy of the two group was evaluated after a course of treatment. Results:The total efficiency of the two groups were 97.78%, there is no significant difference in two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of the two treatment of dysphagia from pseudo bulbar palsy after stroke was similar, while acupoint catgut embedding therapy needs only once every 2 weeks, which was more easily accepted by patients.