CAJ | 학술논문

科技计划项目数据汇交政策是保证科学数据有序汇交的前提.在调研国外科技计划项目管理机构、学术期刊机构、相关数据组织等三类机构的现有数据汇交政策,并对比美国自然科学基金会(NSF)与我国科技部国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)资源环境领域项目数据汇交的政策差异的基础上,指出国外科技计划项目数据汇交在数据汇交政策制定、数据质量控制、数据产权保护、数据共享服务等6个方面对我国的启示.
과기계화항목수거회교정책시보증과학수거유서회교적전제.재조연국외과기계화항목관리궤구、학술기간궤구、상관수거조직등삼류궤구적현유수거회교정책,병대비미국자연과학기금회(NSF)여아국과기부국가중점기출연구발전계화(973계화)자원배경영역항목수거회교적정책차이적기출상,지출국외과기계화항목수거회교재수거회교정책제정、수거질량공제、수거산권보호、수거공향복무등6개방면대아국적계시.
Science and technology research programs are the major sources of scientific data. With the implementation of large numbers of scientific programs, more and more research data is collected and accumulated. Archiving and sharing those data is not only the representation of benefits resulted from the national investment in science, but also an important way to share and reuse them. Data archiving policies of science and technology research programs are guarantees that make scientific data archived. This paper investigated data archiving policies of numerous international agencies. These agencies can be divided into 3 types, i.e., science and technology research program management agency, international academic journal agency, and international data organization. The differences were compared among policies in the field of resource and environment between National Science Foundation (NSF) of USA and State Key Basic Research Development Program (973 program) of China. Based on the policy investigation and comparison, serials of inspiration obtained from the international programs were proposed finally, such as archiving policy making, data quality controlling, copyright protection and data sharing services and so on.