按摩与康复医学
按摩與康複醫學
안마여강복의학
Chinese Manipulation & Rehabilitation Medicine
2013年
1期
62-64
,共3页
腰肌劳损%蜡疗%手法??
腰肌勞損%蠟療%手法??
요기로손%사료%수법??
lumbar muscle strain%wax therapy%technique
目的:探讨蜡疗配合手法治疗腰肌劳损的临床疗效.方法:纳入我院门诊就诊的120例腰肌劳损患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各60例.对照组采用手法治疗,治疗组在对照组的基础上配合蜡疗,治疗结束后进行疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)进行评分及疗效评定.结果:与治疗前比较,治疗组与对照组治疗后疼痛VAS评分有显著性降低(P<0.05);与对照组比较,治疗组治疗前疼痛VAS评分无显著性差异(P>0.05),治疗后疼痛VAS评分明显优于对照组(P<0.05),治疗组治疗前后差值与对照组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05),治疗组治疗后患者临床疗效有显著性改善(P<0.01),治疗组总有效率(100.0%)大于对照组总有效率(88.3%).结论:采用蜡疗配合手法治疗腰肌劳损能显著减轻患者疼痛,改善症状体征,其镇痛效应与临床疗效明显优于单纯手法.
目的:探討蠟療配閤手法治療腰肌勞損的臨床療效.方法:納入我院門診就診的120例腰肌勞損患者,隨機分為治療組和對照組,每組各60例.對照組採用手法治療,治療組在對照組的基礎上配閤蠟療,治療結束後進行疼痛視覺模擬評分法(VAS)進行評分及療效評定.結果:與治療前比較,治療組與對照組治療後疼痛VAS評分有顯著性降低(P<0.05);與對照組比較,治療組治療前疼痛VAS評分無顯著性差異(P>0.05),治療後疼痛VAS評分明顯優于對照組(P<0.05),治療組治療前後差值與對照組比較有顯著性差異(P<0.05),治療組治療後患者臨床療效有顯著性改善(P<0.01),治療組總有效率(100.0%)大于對照組總有效率(88.3%).結論:採用蠟療配閤手法治療腰肌勞損能顯著減輕患者疼痛,改善癥狀體徵,其鎮痛效應與臨床療效明顯優于單純手法.
목적:탐토사료배합수법치료요기로손적림상료효.방법:납입아원문진취진적120례요기로손환자,수궤분위치료조화대조조,매조각60례.대조조채용수법치료,치료조재대조조적기출상배합사료,치료결속후진행동통시각모의평분법(VAS)진행평분급료효평정.결과:여치료전비교,치료조여대조조치료후동통VAS평분유현저성강저(P<0.05);여대조조비교,치료조치료전동통VAS평분무현저성차이(P>0.05),치료후동통VAS평분명현우우대조조(P<0.05),치료조치료전후차치여대조조비교유현저성차이(P<0.05),치료조치료후환자림상료효유현저성개선(P<0.01),치료조총유효솔(100.0%)대우대조조총유효솔(88.3%).결론:채용사료배합수법치료요기로손능현저감경환자동통,개선증상체정,기진통효응여림상료효명현우우단순수법.
Objective: To explore the efficacy of using wax therapy cooperating technique to treat lumbar muscle strain. Methods: 120 patients with lumbar muscle strain treating in outpatient service were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, every group was 60 cases. Control group was used technique, while on the basis of control group, treatment group was cooper-ated wax therapy. After treatment, they were all graded and estimated treatment effect by using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Results:Compared with prior treatment, the VAS of treatment group and control group had significantly reduced (P<0.05); Compared with control group, the VAS of treatment group had no significant difference before treatment (P>0.05), the VAS was obviously higher than that of control group after treatment (P<0.05). Compared with control group, the differ-ential value of prior treatment and posttreatment in treatment group had significant difference (P<0.05). The clinic efficacy after treatment in treatment group had significant improvement (P<0.01). The total effective rate (100.0%) of treatment group was higher than that of control group (88.3%). Conclusion:Using wax therapy cooperating technique to treat lumbar muscle strain can significant-ly reduce the pain of patient, improve the symptoms and signs. The analgesic effect and clinic effica-cy is better than simple technique.