CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨微创稳定系统(LISS)与解剖钢板治疗胫骨近端复杂性骨折的临床疗效.方法选择湖南省桃源县人民医院收治的78例胫骨近端复杂性骨折患者为研究对象,将其随机分成试验组和对照组,对照组采用传统解剖钢板内固定治疗,试验组采用LISS治疗,比较两组疗效.结果试验组切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、完全负重时间等明显优于对照组(P<0.05);并发症的发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05);膝关节功能评价结果优良率明显优于对照组(P<0.05).结论 LISS内固定治疗胫骨近端复杂性骨折损伤小,术后恢复快,并发症少,安全性好.
목적탐토미창은정계통(LISS)여해부강판치료경골근단복잡성골절적림상료효.방법선택호남성도원현인민의원수치적78례경골근단복잡성골절환자위연구대상,장기수궤분성시험조화대조조,대조조채용전통해부강판내고정치료,시험조채용LISS치료,비교량조료효.결과시험조절구장도、수술시간、술중출혈량、골절유합시간、완전부중시간등명현우우대조조(P<0.05);병발증적발생솔명현저우대조조(P<0.05);슬관절공능평개결과우량솔명현우우대조조(P<0.05).결론 LISS내고정치료경골근단복잡성골절손상소,술후회복쾌,병발증소,안전성호.
Objective To explore the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) treatment with the anatomical plates of the proximal tibia complexity of the fracture. Methods The proximal tibia in our hospital complex fractures of 78 cases of the study, were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, control group Ayong traditional anatomic plate fixation for the treatment, the experimental group LISS treatment, compare group efficacy. Results The experimental test groups, incision length, surgery time, blood loss, fracture healing time, full weight bearing time than the control group (P<0.05); the incidence of complications was significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05 The); knee function evaluation results of the excellent and good rate was significantly better than the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion LISS fixation in the treatment of proximal tibia complex fracture damage, faster recovery, fewer complications, and good security.