当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2013年
9期
132-133
,共2页
多发性硬化%甲基强的松龙%鞘内注射
多髮性硬化%甲基彊的鬆龍%鞘內註射
다발성경화%갑기강적송룡%초내주사
Multiple sclerosis%Methylprednisolone%Intrathecal injection
目的比较甲基强的松龙鞘内注射和冲击疗法在治疗急性期多发性硬化症中的临床疗效.方法将2008年10月~2010年12月住院治疗的56例多发性硬化症患者分为均等的两组,一组为甲基强的松龙鞘内注射,另一组为甲基强的松龙冲击治疗.比较两组的临床疗效、EDSS评分、住院情况以及复发情况.结果鞘内注射MPS组患者临床显效率89.3%显著高于MPS组82.1%(P<0.05);鞘内注射MPS组EDSS(2.4±1.1)分,显著低于MPS冲击组(3.5±1.6)分,(P<0.05);鞘内注射MPS组患者平均住院时间(17.4±3.8)d短于MPS冲击组(32.5±4.2)d(P<0.05),住院费用(5341.2±1437.3)元也低于MPS冲击组(9766.8±1728.7)元(P<0.05);鞘内注射MPS组患者复发率17.9%相对较低,且患者复发的平均间隔时间(11.5±1.4)个月也明显短于MPS冲击组(5.1±1.2)个月(P<0.05).结论鞘内注射甲基强的松龙治疗急性期多发性硬化症疗效更快,患者住院时间短,神经功能恢复快,且复发率低.
目的比較甲基彊的鬆龍鞘內註射和遲擊療法在治療急性期多髮性硬化癥中的臨床療效.方法將2008年10月~2010年12月住院治療的56例多髮性硬化癥患者分為均等的兩組,一組為甲基彊的鬆龍鞘內註射,另一組為甲基彊的鬆龍遲擊治療.比較兩組的臨床療效、EDSS評分、住院情況以及複髮情況.結果鞘內註射MPS組患者臨床顯效率89.3%顯著高于MPS組82.1%(P<0.05);鞘內註射MPS組EDSS(2.4±1.1)分,顯著低于MPS遲擊組(3.5±1.6)分,(P<0.05);鞘內註射MPS組患者平均住院時間(17.4±3.8)d短于MPS遲擊組(32.5±4.2)d(P<0.05),住院費用(5341.2±1437.3)元也低于MPS遲擊組(9766.8±1728.7)元(P<0.05);鞘內註射MPS組患者複髮率17.9%相對較低,且患者複髮的平均間隔時間(11.5±1.4)箇月也明顯短于MPS遲擊組(5.1±1.2)箇月(P<0.05).結論鞘內註射甲基彊的鬆龍治療急性期多髮性硬化癥療效更快,患者住院時間短,神經功能恢複快,且複髮率低.
목적비교갑기강적송룡초내주사화충격요법재치료급성기다발성경화증중적림상료효.방법장2008년10월~2010년12월주원치료적56례다발성경화증환자분위균등적량조,일조위갑기강적송룡초내주사,령일조위갑기강적송룡충격치료.비교량조적림상료효、EDSS평분、주원정황이급복발정황.결과초내주사MPS조환자림상현효솔89.3%현저고우MPS조82.1%(P<0.05);초내주사MPS조EDSS(2.4±1.1)분,현저저우MPS충격조(3.5±1.6)분,(P<0.05);초내주사MPS조환자평균주원시간(17.4±3.8)d단우MPS충격조(32.5±4.2)d(P<0.05),주원비용(5341.2±1437.3)원야저우MPS충격조(9766.8±1728.7)원(P<0.05);초내주사MPS조환자복발솔17.9%상대교저,차환자복발적평균간격시간(11.5±1.4)개월야명현단우MPS충격조(5.1±1.2)개월(P<0.05).결론초내주사갑기강적송룡치료급성기다발성경화증료효경쾌,환자주원시간단,신경공능회복쾌,차복발솔저.
@@@@Objective To compare the clinical efficacy for methyl prednisolone intrathecal injection and shock therapy in the treatment of acute multiple sclerosis. Methods 56 patients with multiple sclerosis patients hospitalized from October 2008 to 2010 were divided into the equal two groups. One group was taken for intrathecal injection of methylprednisolone, and the other group was taken with methylprednisolone pulse therapy. The clinical efficacy, EDSS scores, hospitalizations, and recurrence rate for the two groups were compared. Results The clinically significant efficiency for intrathecal injection of MPS group 89.3%was significantly higher than the MPS group 82.1% (P<0.05). The EDSS for intrathecal injection MPS Group (2.4±1.1) scores was significantly lower than the MPS shocking group (3.5±1.6) scores (P<0.05). The average length of stay for intrathecal injection of MPS group (17.4±3.8) days was shorter than the MPS shock group (32.5±4.2) days (P<0.05), and hospitalization costs (5341.2±1437.3) Yuan was lower than the MPS shocking group (9766.8±1728.7) Yuan (P<0.05). The relapse rate for intrathecal injection of MPS patients 17.9%was relatively low, and the average interval in patients (11.5±1.4) months was significantly shorter than the MPS shock group (5.1±1.2) months (P<0.05). Conclusion The efficacy for intrathecal injection of methylprednisolone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis during the acute phase is fast, the period of hospitalization is short, and it is with a faster recovery of neurological function and low recurrence rate.