应用预防医学
應用預防醫學
응용예방의학
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
2012年
6期
339-342
,共4页
钟格梅%赵鹏%郑承杰%黄林%李明江%黄江平%黎勇%李裕利%张伟尉
鐘格梅%趙鵬%鄭承傑%黃林%李明江%黃江平%黎勇%李裕利%張偉尉
종격매%조붕%정승걸%황림%리명강%황강평%려용%리유리%장위위
饮用水%农村%环境卫生
飲用水%農村%環境衛生
음용수%농촌%배경위생
Drinking water%Rural area%Environmental health
目的了解和掌握农村改厕和粪便处理,以及农村垃圾、污水治理等现状,为政府及有关部门制定农村环境卫生改善规划提供科学依据.方法按分层随机方式抽取29个县、580个行政村和2900户,采用统一的调查表,通过访谈、现场观察等方法收集调查数据.结果2011年广西农村饮用集中式供水人口比例为43.07%,农村无害化卫生厕所普及率为57.11%,分别较2006年的31.66%和43.79%提高了11.41和13.32个百分点.但垃圾和污水处理设施匮乏,县及县以下垃圾和污水处理覆盖人口比例分别为12.34%和14.54%,且绝大部分为县城城区人口,在广大的农村地区大量农村生活和养殖业垃圾、污水未能进行有效处理.农村环境卫生脏乱差问题严重,生活垃圾随意堆放率66.03%,垃圾堆放点苍蝇孳生率93.62%,84.66%的垃圾堆放点有臭味;生活污水以排到河流和坑塘为主,随意排放率65.17%.家庭户饮生水率10.03%,调查户家庭成员腹泻症状两周发生率为9.28%,腹痛症状发生率为8.03%,发热症状发生率为13.28%.结论广西农村环境卫生设施匮乏,存在各种影响人群身体健康的环境危害因素,亟需采取措施改善农村环境卫生现状.
目的瞭解和掌握農村改廁和糞便處理,以及農村垃圾、汙水治理等現狀,為政府及有關部門製定農村環境衛生改善規劃提供科學依據.方法按分層隨機方式抽取29箇縣、580箇行政村和2900戶,採用統一的調查錶,通過訪談、現場觀察等方法收集調查數據.結果2011年廣西農村飲用集中式供水人口比例為43.07%,農村無害化衛生廁所普及率為57.11%,分彆較2006年的31.66%和43.79%提高瞭11.41和13.32箇百分點.但垃圾和汙水處理設施匱乏,縣及縣以下垃圾和汙水處理覆蓋人口比例分彆為12.34%和14.54%,且絕大部分為縣城城區人口,在廣大的農村地區大量農村生活和養殖業垃圾、汙水未能進行有效處理.農村環境衛生髒亂差問題嚴重,生活垃圾隨意堆放率66.03%,垃圾堆放點蒼蠅孳生率93.62%,84.66%的垃圾堆放點有臭味;生活汙水以排到河流和坑塘為主,隨意排放率65.17%.傢庭戶飲生水率10.03%,調查戶傢庭成員腹瀉癥狀兩週髮生率為9.28%,腹痛癥狀髮生率為8.03%,髮熱癥狀髮生率為13.28%.結論廣西農村環境衛生設施匱乏,存在各種影響人群身體健康的環境危害因素,亟需採取措施改善農村環境衛生現狀.
목적료해화장악농촌개측화분편처리,이급농촌랄급、오수치리등현상,위정부급유관부문제정농촌배경위생개선규화제공과학의거.방법안분층수궤방식추취29개현、580개행정촌화2900호,채용통일적조사표,통과방담、현장관찰등방법수집조사수거.결과2011년엄서농촌음용집중식공수인구비례위43.07%,농촌무해화위생측소보급솔위57.11%,분별교2006년적31.66%화43.79%제고료11.41화13.32개백분점.단랄급화오수처리설시궤핍,현급현이하랄급화오수처리복개인구비례분별위12.34%화14.54%,차절대부분위현성성구인구,재엄대적농촌지구대량농촌생활화양식업랄급、오수미능진행유효처리.농촌배경위생장란차문제엄중,생활랄급수의퇴방솔66.03%,랄급퇴방점창승자생솔93.62%,84.66%적랄급퇴방점유취미;생활오수이배도하류화갱당위주,수의배방솔65.17%.가정호음생수솔10.03%,조사호가정성원복사증상량주발생솔위9.28%,복통증상발생솔위8.03%,발열증상발생솔위13.28%.결론엄서농촌배경위생설시궤핍,존재각충영향인군신체건강적배경위해인소,극수채취조시개선농촌배경위생현상.
Objective To assess the current status of sanitation improvement and waste treatment in rural areas in Guangxi so as to provide scientific evidence for formulating rural sanitation improvement program. Methods 2900 households and 580 villages in 29 counties were selected using proportional stratified randomized sampling. Data were collected through questionnaries, interviews and on-site investigation. Results In 2011, the coverage rate was 43.07% for access to centralized drinking water and 57.11% for access to sanitary latrines, which increased by 11.41% and 13.32% respectively compared with that in 2006. However, there was a lack of waste treatment facilities. Only 12.34% of the population at county level and 14.54% under county level were covered,and most township residents, were covered by wastewater treatment systems. In most rural areas, the environmental sanitation condjtion was poor, The solid wastes and wastewater from many households and breeding industry still stayed untreated. Garbage was scattered all over the place. 93.62% of garbage dumps were swarmed with flies and 84.66% of them smelled. Wastewater directly flew into rivers and ponds, with an untreatment rate of 65.17% . 10.03% of housholds drank unboiled water. In 2 weeks of household surveys, the attack rates were 9.28% for diarrhoeal, 8.03% for abdominal pain, and 13.28% for fever. Conclusion Inadequacy of sanitation facilities leads to the existence of serious health threats; thus there is a strong need to implement sanitation promontion in the rural areas.