CAJ | 학술논문

文章认为,源企业强制性影响战略的使用与目标企业的分配公平感知、程序公平感知均负相关;非强制性影响战略的使用与目标企业的分配公平感知、程序公平感知均正相关.目标企业的依赖不对称对这些关系会产生调节效应:依赖不对称分别负向调节强制性影响战略的使用与目标企业分配公平感知、程序公平感知之间的负相关关系;但是,依赖不对称正向调节源企业非强制性影响战略的使用与目标企业分配公平感知、程序公平感知之间的正相关关系.
문장인위,원기업강제성영향전략적사용여목표기업적분배공평감지、정서공평감지균부상관;비강제성영향전략적사용여목표기업적분배공평감지、정서공평감지균정상관.목표기업적의뢰불대칭대저사관계회산생조절효응:의뢰불대칭분별부향조절강제성영향전략적사용여목표기업분배공평감지、정서공평감지지간적부상관관계;단시,의뢰불대칭정향조절원기업비강제성영향전략적사용여목표기업분배공평감지、정서공평감지지간적정상관관계.
The study proposes that a source member’s use of coercive influence strategies has a negative effect on the target’s perception of distributive justice or procedural justice,whereas the use of non-coercive influence strategies has a positive ef?fect on the target’s perception of distributive justice or procedural justice.Furthermore,the asymmetric in target enterprise has moderating effect on these relationships,that is,the asymmetric has a negative effect on the negative relationship of the use of coercive influence strategies and the target’s perception of distributive justice or procedural justice,and the asymmetric has a positive effect on the positive relationship of non-coercive influence strategies and the target’s perception of distributive justice or procedural justice.