农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2013年
1期
209-217
,共9页
付意成%高婷%闫丽娟%张爱静%阮本清
付意成%高婷%閆麗娟%張愛靜%阮本清
부의성%고정%염려연%장애정%원본청
农业%生态%环境保护%补偿标准%能值%环境可持续指数%永定河流域
農業%生態%環境保護%補償標準%能值%環境可持續指數%永定河流域
농업%생태%배경보호%보상표준%능치%배경가지속지수%영정하류역
agriculture%ecology%environmental protection%compensation standard%emergy%emergy sustainability index%Yongding River basin
实施农业生态补偿是消除当前农业生产中的负面影响,保证环境友好型农业生产顺利进行的前提.针对当前的农业生态补偿标准计算中,价值受时空动态变化影响较大、投入成本难以准确计量的弊端,借助能值与价值之间的可转化性,给出基于农业可持续发展的生态补偿标准计算体系.选择永定河官厅水库以上流域为研究区,从可更新资源(R)、不可更新资源(N)、物质投入(M)、服务成本(S)的能值计算出发,计算得出永定河流域的农业生产的总能值为3.80×1016 Sej/hm2,其中可更新的能值为1.59×1016 Sej/hm2,不可更新能值2.21×1016 Sej/hm2.研究区农业生产的环境可持续指数(ESI)为0.1056,流域农业处于严重不可持续状态,应实施农业生态补偿进行调整.借鉴能值与生态服务价值之间的可转化性,为实现流域农业生产的可持续,下游区域政府或受益部门应对上游农业水土流失防护补偿约4亿元.该文研究结果的应用表明,基于能值的农业生态补偿标准计算方法具有一定的适用性.
實施農業生態補償是消除噹前農業生產中的負麵影響,保證環境友好型農業生產順利進行的前提.針對噹前的農業生態補償標準計算中,價值受時空動態變化影響較大、投入成本難以準確計量的弊耑,藉助能值與價值之間的可轉化性,給齣基于農業可持續髮展的生態補償標準計算體繫.選擇永定河官廳水庫以上流域為研究區,從可更新資源(R)、不可更新資源(N)、物質投入(M)、服務成本(S)的能值計算齣髮,計算得齣永定河流域的農業生產的總能值為3.80×1016 Sej/hm2,其中可更新的能值為1.59×1016 Sej/hm2,不可更新能值2.21×1016 Sej/hm2.研究區農業生產的環境可持續指數(ESI)為0.1056,流域農業處于嚴重不可持續狀態,應實施農業生態補償進行調整.藉鑒能值與生態服務價值之間的可轉化性,為實現流域農業生產的可持續,下遊區域政府或受益部門應對上遊農業水土流失防護補償約4億元.該文研究結果的應用錶明,基于能值的農業生態補償標準計算方法具有一定的適用性.
실시농업생태보상시소제당전농업생산중적부면영향,보증배경우호형농업생산순리진행적전제.침대당전적농업생태보상표준계산중,개치수시공동태변화영향교대、투입성본난이준학계량적폐단,차조능치여개치지간적가전화성,급출기우농업가지속발전적생태보상표준계산체계.선택영정하관청수고이상류역위연구구,종가경신자원(R)、불가경신자원(N)、물질투입(M)、복무성본(S)적능치계산출발,계산득출영정하류역적농업생산적총능치위3.80×1016 Sej/hm2,기중가경신적능치위1.59×1016 Sej/hm2,불가경신능치2.21×1016 Sej/hm2.연구구농업생산적배경가지속지수(ESI)위0.1056,류역농업처우엄중불가지속상태,응실시농업생태보상진행조정.차감능치여생태복무개치지간적가전화성,위실현류역농업생산적가지속,하유구역정부혹수익부문응대상유농업수토류실방호보상약4억원.해문연구결과적응용표명,기우능치적농업생태보상표준계산방법구유일정적괄용성.
The aim of agro-ecological compensation is to eliminate the negative effects during agricultural production, and promote the strategy implementation of environment-friendly agriculture. At present, agro-ecological compensation standard is greatly affected by the temporal and spatial variation of value, and the inaccuracy of input cost calculation result. Emergy is an important advanced technology in calculation of material inputs and efficiency of agricultural ecological protection quality. The paper gave the study method of agro-ecological compensation standard based on the conversion between emergy and value, as well as the process to calculate agro-ecological protection cost and benefit. On the basis of defining the components within the system, and allowing the identification of inputs and output of agricultural production, the annual emergy flows were calculated. Then the emergy indicators were determined to evaluate the performance of the agriculture environmental system. Taking the upstream of Guanting Reservoir in Yongding River basin as study area, on the basis of calculating the emergy of renewable natural resources (R), non-renewable natural resources (N), materials (M) and services (S), the total emergy, renewable emergy and non-renewable emergy of Yongding River basin agro-ecological system were 3.80×1016, 1.59×1016 and 2.21×1016 Sej/hm2 respectively. According to the calculating data of ESI (Environmental Sustainability Index for the management of agricultural output and environmental load, assumed to obtain the largest production with the minimum of environmental damage), the sustainable development degree of basin agricultural production was determined. The index of ESI was calculated by transforming natural resources, agricultural products, and environment-friendly agricultural production economic input into emergy flow. Combining the calculation results of emergy, fundamental quantity ESI is 0.1056, which is far below 5. Therefore, unsustainable input or output accounts for a large proportion during basin agricultural production, which indicates that agro-ecological system of study area is not sustainable, and to adopt agro-ecological compensation measures is necessary. The respective emprice of the environmental benefits (R, N, M, S) supplied by the reserve was evaluated corresponding to the biomass production. By combining high productivity and good market prices, the emergy exchange ratio reveals that the payment for the environmental services is realized. Considering the environmental flows that the farmers take from protecting nature without payment, a value balance based on the beneficiary-pays rather than the producer-pays principle, agro-ecological compensation was calculated as commercial transactions where the environmental service is acquired from the watershed farmers. The option proposed in the paper indicates that by the adoption of the emergy accounting method, the government and producers would be responsible for a portion of the PES, and the emprice calculated for the environmental support and the environmental benefits of farmland should be used to decide who will bear the responsibility for making payments for environmental services. To realize the sustainable development of basin agriculture, the government and beneficiary sectors will compensate farmers soil loss preventive costs 400 million Yuan. The compensation standard calculation method of agro-ecological system in the light of emergy is feasible. Further studies are necessary on agricultural production environmental services, such as the maintenance of the biodiversity and natural biocenosis, and hydrological services.