农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2013年
3期
273-278
,共6页
林丽静%程盛华%李积华%黄茂芳%唐永富%朱德明
林麗靜%程盛華%李積華%黃茂芳%唐永富%硃德明
림려정%정성화%리적화%황무방%당영부%주덕명
农药%食用油%清除%茶树油%豇豆%有机磷%氨基甲酸酯%拟除虫菊酯
農藥%食用油%清除%茶樹油%豇豆%有機燐%氨基甲痠酯%擬除蟲菊酯
농약%식용유%청제%다수유%강두%유궤린%안기갑산지%의제충국지
pesticides%vegetable oils%removal%tea tree oil%cowpea%organoposphorous%pyrethroid%carbamate
为研究茶树油清除果蔬农药残留的效果,该试验选取豇豆为供试材料,以不同浓度的茶树油和水溶性茶树油等清洗处理,利用气相色谱和气相色谱-质谱联用检测豇豆内有机磷类、拟除虫菊酯类和氨基甲酸酯类的农药残留量,计算农药清除率.供试7种农药中,水胺硫磷、马拉硫磷、氧乐果、三唑磷、毒死蜱、氯氰菊酯和速灭威在豇豆中的初始浓度分别为:20.395、1.690、6.524、10.719、0.160、12.104和23.057 mg/kg.茶树油处理后检测结果表明,茶树油具有清除残留在豇豆中农药的能力,清除效果随茶树油浓度增加而增强;清除有机磷类农药效果较拟除虫菊酯类和氨基甲酸酯类农药明显.茶树油比去离子水、市售果蔬农残清洗剂清除农药残留效果显著,同时,相同浓度的水溶性茶树油比相应茶树油清除农药残留能力强.0.8%水溶性茶树油清除效果最佳,清除率分别为水胺硫磷80.48%,马拉硫磷94.54%,三唑磷82.79%,毒死蜱84.58%,氧乐果72.20%,氯氰菊酯80.51%,速灭威72.21%.通过研究结果可知,茶树油可作为有开发前景的果蔬清除剂.
為研究茶樹油清除果蔬農藥殘留的效果,該試驗選取豇豆為供試材料,以不同濃度的茶樹油和水溶性茶樹油等清洗處理,利用氣相色譜和氣相色譜-質譜聯用檢測豇豆內有機燐類、擬除蟲菊酯類和氨基甲痠酯類的農藥殘留量,計算農藥清除率.供試7種農藥中,水胺硫燐、馬拉硫燐、氧樂果、三唑燐、毒死蜱、氯氰菊酯和速滅威在豇豆中的初始濃度分彆為:20.395、1.690、6.524、10.719、0.160、12.104和23.057 mg/kg.茶樹油處理後檢測結果錶明,茶樹油具有清除殘留在豇豆中農藥的能力,清除效果隨茶樹油濃度增加而增彊;清除有機燐類農藥效果較擬除蟲菊酯類和氨基甲痠酯類農藥明顯.茶樹油比去離子水、市售果蔬農殘清洗劑清除農藥殘留效果顯著,同時,相同濃度的水溶性茶樹油比相應茶樹油清除農藥殘留能力彊.0.8%水溶性茶樹油清除效果最佳,清除率分彆為水胺硫燐80.48%,馬拉硫燐94.54%,三唑燐82.79%,毒死蜱84.58%,氧樂果72.20%,氯氰菊酯80.51%,速滅威72.21%.通過研究結果可知,茶樹油可作為有開髮前景的果蔬清除劑.
위연구다수유청제과소농약잔류적효과,해시험선취강두위공시재료,이불동농도적다수유화수용성다수유등청세처리,이용기상색보화기상색보-질보련용검측강두내유궤린류、의제충국지류화안기갑산지류적농약잔류량,계산농약청제솔.공시7충농약중,수알류린、마랍류린、양악과、삼서린、독사비、록청국지화속멸위재강두중적초시농도분별위:20.395、1.690、6.524、10.719、0.160、12.104화23.057 mg/kg.다수유처리후검측결과표명,다수유구유청제잔류재강두중농약적능력,청제효과수다수유농도증가이증강;청제유궤린류농약효과교의제충국지류화안기갑산지류농약명현.다수유비거리자수、시수과소농잔청세제청제농약잔류효과현저,동시,상동농도적수용성다수유비상응다수유청제농약잔류능력강.0.8%수용성다수유청제효과최가,청제솔분별위수알류린80.48%,마랍류린94.54%,삼서린82.79%,독사비84.58%,양악과72.20%,록청국지80.51%,속멸위72.21%.통과연구결과가지,다수유가작위유개발전경적과소청제제.
Pesticides are widely used as an insurance policy against devastating crop losses from pests and diseases. Excessive usage of pesticides may lead to contamination of the crop and the environment, eventually posing a risk of pesticide-related illnesses to humans. Previous literature has shown that water washing is only partially effective in removing pesticides, and in the case of liposoluble pesticides, a cosolvent must be used as an adjuvant. Recently, naturally occurring adjuvants are gaining prominence over synthetic chemical compounds. Tea tree oil (TTO, the oil of Melaleuca alternifolia), a natural, volatile essential oil, is mainly extracted by steam distillation from the fresh leaves and terminal branchlets of the plant. It has attracted significant interest due to its antifungal, antiviral, and antibacterial bioactivities. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are fewer experimental data evaluating its efficacy in the removal of pesticide residues. In this study, the effects of TTO on removing pesticide residue were carried out in the cowpea. Volume:volume (v:v) concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.8% of TTO and water soluble tea tree oil (WTTO) in water were used to remove a standardized pesticide mixture (organophosphorus, pyrethroid, and carbamate compounds) from cowpeas. Sample pretreatment (pesticide application to cowpeas) was performed according to agricultural industry standards. The objective pesticide residues in cowpeas were assayed by gas chromatography (GC) and chromatography-mass spectrometry detection (GC-MS), and then the clearance rate was calculated. The results showed that TTO was able to remove the three kinds of pesticides from cowpeas. Moreover, the removal efficiency increased with increasing concentration of TTO. The effect of clearing organophosphate was much more obvious than that of either pyrethroid or carbamate. It was suggested that small liposoluble molecules of TTO rapidly infiltrate the cowpea surface to dissolve the organophosphate pesticides depending on the compatibility principle. For carbamate pesticides, such as carbofuran, owing to its high polarity, TTO could not infiltrate into the internal of cowpeas to dissolve the residuals, resulting in the lower clearing efficiency. In conclusion, to remove pesticide residues, the commercially available extract TTO was more effective than deionized water in removing pesticide residues from fruits and vegetables. In comparison, WTTO was even more effective in removing pesticide residues than the same concentration of TTO. Among all treatments, 0.8% WTTO showed the greatest removal efficiency. The removal rates achieved by WTTO were as follows: 80.48% for isocarbophos, 94.54% for malathion, 82.79% for triazophos, 84.58% for chlorpyrifos, 72.20% for omethoate, 80.51% for cypermethrin, and 72.21% for meta-tolyl-N-methylcarbamate (MTMC). Therefore, TTO is expected to be useful as a fruit and vegetable cleaning adjuvant.