农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2013年
5期
12-18
,共7页
任述光%谢方平%罗锡文%孙松林
任述光%謝方平%囉錫文%孫鬆林
임술광%사방평%라석문%손송림
农业机械%试验%模型%柔性齿%刚性齿%脱粒功耗%脱粒水稻
農業機械%試驗%模型%柔性齒%剛性齒%脫粒功耗%脫粒水稻
농업궤계%시험%모형%유성치%강성치%탈립공모%탈립수도
agricultural machine%experiments%models%flexible tooth%rigid tooth%power consumption%paddy threshing
柔性脱粒能减少刚性脱粒冲击所带来的水稻籽粒破损,对柔性脱粒的研究与应用早已引起了农机研究者的广泛关注.为了比较柔性齿滚筒与刚性齿滚筒脱粒水稻的功耗差异,该文将脱粒滚筒视为刚体,脱粒齿视为弹性体,脱粒过程视为柔性脱粒齿对水稻籽粒的碰撞冲击过程,通过分析比较刚性齿与柔性齿脱粒过程中冲量矩及对水稻籽粒打击力,建立了刚性齿脱粒滚筒与柔性齿脱粒滚筒的功耗模型,同时通过对刚性和柔性脱粒过程碰撞冲量和动能损失的分析比较,从理论上证明了柔性齿脱粒相对于刚性齿脱粒具有动能损失小、功耗低.试验结果表明在喂入量相同情况下,脱粒齿直径相同的刚性齿滚筒比柔性齿滚筒的转矩大,消耗的功率也大,验证了柔性脱粒能降低打击力与功耗的理论分析结果.
柔性脫粒能減少剛性脫粒遲擊所帶來的水稻籽粒破損,對柔性脫粒的研究與應用早已引起瞭農機研究者的廣汎關註.為瞭比較柔性齒滾筒與剛性齒滾筒脫粒水稻的功耗差異,該文將脫粒滾筒視為剛體,脫粒齒視為彈性體,脫粒過程視為柔性脫粒齒對水稻籽粒的踫撞遲擊過程,通過分析比較剛性齒與柔性齒脫粒過程中遲量矩及對水稻籽粒打擊力,建立瞭剛性齒脫粒滾筒與柔性齒脫粒滾筒的功耗模型,同時通過對剛性和柔性脫粒過程踫撞遲量和動能損失的分析比較,從理論上證明瞭柔性齒脫粒相對于剛性齒脫粒具有動能損失小、功耗低.試驗結果錶明在餵入量相同情況下,脫粒齒直徑相同的剛性齒滾筒比柔性齒滾筒的轉矩大,消耗的功率也大,驗證瞭柔性脫粒能降低打擊力與功耗的理論分析結果.
유성탈립능감소강성탈립충격소대래적수도자립파손,대유성탈립적연구여응용조이인기료농궤연구자적엄범관주.위료비교유성치곤통여강성치곤통탈립수도적공모차이,해문장탈립곤통시위강체,탈립치시위탄성체,탈립과정시위유성탈립치대수도자립적팽당충격과정,통과분석비교강성치여유성치탈립과정중충량구급대수도자립타격력,건립료강성치탈립곤통여유성치탈립곤통적공모모형,동시통과대강성화유성탈립과정팽당충량화동능손실적분석비교,종이론상증명료유성치탈립상대우강성치탈립구유동능손실소、공모저.시험결과표명재위입량상동정황하,탈립치직경상동적강성치곤통비유성치곤통적전구대,소모적공솔야대,험증료유성탈립능강저타격력여공모적이론분석결과.
The study and use of flexible threshing teeth are of interest to researchers in agricultural mechanization because flexible teeth appear to damage grain less than rigid teeth. For a flexible threshing tooth, consisting of an elastic beam fixed on one end, a differential equation of its deformation curve was created, the deformation of which was calculated by numerical methods, which provided necessary condition for dynamic analysis. The corresponding formulation of calculating power consumption was deduced based on theoretic analysis in this paper. The hypothesis was as follows:the threshing roller was regarded as rigid body, the threshing teeth as elastic bodies, and threshing as the impact between threshing teeth and paddy rice. The differences in impulse moment and beating force for paddy grain between the rigid threshing tooth and the flexible one were analyzed and compared, and their respective power-consumption models were established in this paper. By analyzing the loss of kinetic energy and impact momentum for the threshing processing using the rigid threshing tooth and the flexible one, we concluded that the loss of kinetic energy of flexible threshing was less than that of rigid threshing;likewise, power consumption by flexible-tooth threshing is less than that by rigid-tooth threshing if the feed rates and the rotary speed are equal. @@@@Meanwhile, the theoretical analysis results show that the beating force of the flexible tooth was less than that of the rigid tooth, which was confirmed experimentally. Experimental data showed that the threshing roller has to have a sufficiently high moment of inertia, and the engine enough power, to preserve the stability of the threshing process. We fabricated a number of experimental devices including a transducer for measuring torque, an apparatus to measure angular velocity, and a feeding test-bed. Experiments were conducted by measuring torsion and angular velocity, enabling us to compute the brake power of flexible-tooth and rigid-tooth threshing, respectively. There is an optimal value of tooth length that minimizes power consumption but that is unique for each kind of tooth.