CAJ | 학술논문

为了分析实际工况下农业机械的排放特征,该研究利用车载排放测试系统对12辆农用拖拉机进行怠速、行走和耕作3种操作模式下的田间排放测试.结果发现:在旋耕模式下,CO、HC、NOx和PM 单位时间的排放因子要高于怠速和行走模式,同时较高的油耗使得 CO、HC、NOx基于油耗的排放因子小于怠速和行走模式;测试拖拉机的污染物排放因子随着排放标准的加严呈减小趋势.与中国第1阶段排放标准的测试拖拉机相比,中国第2阶段排放标准的拖拉机4种污染物的单位时间的排放因子分别降低了31.49%、5.96%、6.17%和5.91%.该研究中拖拉机HC、NOx和PM的排放因子要高于NONROAD模型中美国同类机型的结果.通过对大中型农用拖拉机保有量及年使用小时数调查,估算得到2011年中国大中型拖拉机的CO、HC、NOx和PM排放总量分别为32.3、10.6、81.0和9.1万t.与同年的机动车排放量相比,其排放总量不容忽视.
위료분석실제공황하농업궤계적배방특정,해연구이용차재배방측시계통대12량농용타랍궤진행태속、행주화경작3충조작모식하적전간배방측시.결과발현:재선경모식하,CO、HC、NOx화PM 단위시간적배방인자요고우태속화행주모식,동시교고적유모사득 CO、HC、NOx기우유모적배방인자소우태속화행주모식;측시타랍궤적오염물배방인자수착배방표준적가엄정감소추세.여중국제1계단배방표준적측시타랍궤상비,중국제2계단배방표준적타랍궤4충오염물적단위시간적배방인자분별강저료31.49%、5.96%、6.17%화5.91%.해연구중타랍궤HC、NOx화PM적배방인자요고우NONROAD모형중미국동류궤형적결과.통과대대중형농용타랍궤보유량급년사용소시수조사,고산득도2011년중국대중형타랍궤적CO、HC、NOx화PM배방총량분별위32.3、10.6、81.0화9.1만t.여동년적궤동차배방량상비,기배방총량불용홀시.
With the rise of total engine power and population, agricultural machinery has been considered an important pollutant source of the deterioration in air quality in China. However, few studies have focused on agricultural machinery emissions. In this case, it is difficult for the policy makers and researchers to understand the actual emission levels of agricultural machinery in China. To analyze real-world emission characteristics of agricultural machinery, twelve large and middle-sized agricultural tractors were tested by using a portable emission measurement system (PEMS) in this study. The typical operating modes were categorized as idling mode, moving mode, and tillage mode. The results showed that most of the emission peaks occurred on tillage mode, which can be attributed to the variable engine loads of tillage mode. Hourly emission factors of CO,HC,NOx and PM were higher for tillage operating mode than those for idling and moving modes -especially for PM. Hourly emission factors of PM for tillage mode were 52.6 and 63.5 times higher than it was for idling and moving modes. Due to the higher fuel consumption, fuel-based emission factors of CO, HC and NOx for tillage mode were lower than those for idling and moving modes. In this study, we define the tractors before 2007 model year as the Pre-China I machinery. Compared with those of China I Stage and Pre-China I Stage emission standard tractors, gaseous emissions and PM emitted from China II emission standard tractors were lower. The results indicated that from China I Stage to China II Stage, the reductions of average hourly emission factors of the four pollutants were 31.49%,5.96%,6.17%and 5.91%, respectively. Those results also demonstrated the effectiveness of emission control regulation and the improvement of emission control technology. The NONROAD model, which was developed by the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States of America, is widely used to calculate the emission inventory of NONROAD mobile sources and evaluate the emission levels of NONROAD machinery. In this study, we compared the measurement results with the emission factors from the NONROAD model. Results showed that the emission control levels of HC, NOx and PM emissions in this study lagged behind those of the U.S. For instance, HC and PM emission factors from this study are equated with those from model years of 2000 and 2006 on the NONROAD model, while the NOx emission factor from this study is higher than it was from the model year of 1998 on NONROAD model. Extensive work was undertaken in Shanxi Province to obtain the annual working hours of large and middle size tractors. Results show that annual working hours of tractors are 400–430, which is similar with the data on the NONROAD model. Based on the population and annual working hours, we estimate the total emissions of CO, HC, NOx and PM from large and middle size agricultural tractors in 2011 were 32.3, 10.6, 81.0 and 9.1×104 tons, respectively. The data indicates that large and middle size agricultural tractors are an important source of air pollutant in China compared with total emissions from motor vehicles.