生物骨科材料与临床研究
生物骨科材料與臨床研究
생물골과재료여림상연구
ORTHOPAEDIC BIOMECHANICS MATERIALS AND CLINICAL STUDY
2013年
1期
49-51
,共3页
翁峰标%朱立帆%徐浩%张晓剑%侯清凡
翁峰標%硃立帆%徐浩%張曉劍%侯清凡
옹봉표%주립범%서호%장효검%후청범
锤状指%微型锚钉%疗效
錘狀指%微型錨釘%療效
추상지%미형묘정%료효
Mallet finger%Micro-anchor%Efficacy
目的探讨微型锚钉结合克氏针固定治疗锤状指的临床疗效.方法2010年6月~2011年3月,对我院收治的16例锤状指患者采用微型锚钉结合克氏针固定的手术方法治疗.受伤至手术时间(13.5±6.4)d,其中4例受伤后1月余行手术治疗,属陈旧性损伤患者.术后不用外固定,6周后拔除克氏针开始功能锻炼.结果16例患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无并发症发生.16例均获随访,随访时间6~12个月.末次随访时,根据 Crawford 功能评定方法,新鲜损伤组12例患者优9例,良3例,优良率100%,DIP关节活动度(67.9±9.2)°;陈旧性损伤组4例患者良3例,可1例,优良率75%,DIP 关节活动度(53.8±15.3)°.统计结果显示新鲜损伤组患者术后关节活动度及疗效均明显优于陈旧性损伤组患者,其差异具有显著性(<0.05).结论采用微型锚钉结合克氏针固定治疗锤状指是一种简便、有效的方法.
目的探討微型錨釘結閤剋氏針固定治療錘狀指的臨床療效.方法2010年6月~2011年3月,對我院收治的16例錘狀指患者採用微型錨釘結閤剋氏針固定的手術方法治療.受傷至手術時間(13.5±6.4)d,其中4例受傷後1月餘行手術治療,屬陳舊性損傷患者.術後不用外固定,6週後拔除剋氏針開始功能鍛煉.結果16例患者切口均Ⅰ期愈閤,無併髮癥髮生.16例均穫隨訪,隨訪時間6~12箇月.末次隨訪時,根據 Crawford 功能評定方法,新鮮損傷組12例患者優9例,良3例,優良率100%,DIP關節活動度(67.9±9.2)°;陳舊性損傷組4例患者良3例,可1例,優良率75%,DIP 關節活動度(53.8±15.3)°.統計結果顯示新鮮損傷組患者術後關節活動度及療效均明顯優于陳舊性損傷組患者,其差異具有顯著性(<0.05).結論採用微型錨釘結閤剋氏針固定治療錘狀指是一種簡便、有效的方法.
목적탐토미형묘정결합극씨침고정치료추상지적림상료효.방법2010년6월~2011년3월,대아원수치적16례추상지환자채용미형묘정결합극씨침고정적수술방법치료.수상지수술시간(13.5±6.4)d,기중4례수상후1월여행수술치료,속진구성손상환자.술후불용외고정,6주후발제극씨침개시공능단련.결과16례환자절구균Ⅰ기유합,무병발증발생.16례균획수방,수방시간6~12개월.말차수방시,근거 Crawford 공능평정방법,신선손상조12례환자우9례,량3례,우량솔100%,DIP관절활동도(67.9±9.2)°;진구성손상조4례환자량3례,가1례,우량솔75%,DIP 관절활동도(53.8±15.3)°.통계결과현시신선손상조환자술후관절활동도급료효균명현우우진구성손상조환자,기차이구유현저성(<0.05).결론채용미형묘정결합극씨침고정치료추상지시일충간편、유효적방법.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of micro-anchor repair combined with Kirschner wire fixation in the treatment of mallet fingers. Methods From June 2010 to March 2011, 16 patients with mallet fingers were treated by micro-anchor repair combined with Kirschner wire fixation in our hospital. The duration of the deformity before pre-sentation were (13.5 ± 6.4) days. Among them, 4 patients were chronic mallet finger deformity (>1 months after the injury). No external fixation was used postoperatively. The Kirschner wire was removed 6 weeks after operation, then functional exercises were performed. Results All the patients obtained healing of incision by first intention and were followed up for 6~12 months (8.3 months on average). According to the Crawford functional assessment system, the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 3 cases at the final follow-up with an excellent and good rate of 100%in the fresh mallet fingers group, and the range of motion of the DIP joints were (67.9 ± 9.2) ° on average. The results were good in 3 cases, fair in 1 case with an excellent and good rate of 75%in the chronic mallet fingers group, and the range of motion of the DIP joints were (53.8 ± 15.3) ° on average. There were significant difference between two groups in the excellent and good rate and the range of motion of the DIP joints ( <0.05). Conclusion Micro-anchor repair com-bined with Kirschner wire fixation is simple and effective in the treatment of mallet finger.