生态环境学报
生態環境學報
생태배경학보
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT
2013年
1期
66-71
,共6页
马姜明%吴蒙%占婷婷%梁士楚
馬薑明%吳矇%佔婷婷%樑士楚
마강명%오몽%점정정%량사초
物种组成%多样性%檵木群落%岩溶区%漓江流域
物種組成%多樣性%檵木群落%巖溶區%巑江流域
물충조성%다양성%계목군락%암용구%리강류역
species composition%diversity%Loropetalum chinense communities%karst area%Lijiang River valley
以空间代替时间的方法选取典型样地,采用常规群落学调查方法对漓江流域岩溶区立地条件基本一致的檵木(Loropetalum chinense)群落不同恢复阶段的植物物种组成及其多样性变化进行研究.结果表明,(1)在所调查的样方中,共记录维管束植物78种,隶属于45科70属.乔木层的建群种檵木随着群落的恢复其重要值有降低的趋势,而在灌木层则相反.檵木群落不同恢复阶段乔木层和灌木层主要优势种为檵木、小巴豆(Croton xiaopadou)、龙须藤(Bauhinia championii)、红背山麻杆(Alchornea trewioides)和紫凌木(Decaspermum esquirolii),草本层主要优势种为狭穗薹草(Carex ischnostachya)、庐山香科科(Teucrium pernyi)和蔓生莠竹(Microstegium fasciculatum).(2)随着檵木群落的恢复,群落总体、乔木层和灌木层物种丰富度呈现增大的趋势,草本层则相反;Shannon指数和均匀度指数具有一致的变化趋势,乔木层Shannon指数和均匀度指数随檵木群落的恢复呈现增大的趋势,而灌木层、草本层和群落总体则相反.檵木群落不同恢复阶段灌木层Shannon指数均高于乔木层和草本层,而草本层均匀度指数均高于乔木层和灌木层;Simpson指数随檵木群落恢复的变化趋势与Shannon指数和均匀度指数相反.(3)在檵木群落的灌木阶段、乔灌阶段和乔林阶段这3个恢复阶段中,乔灌阶段与乔林阶段之间的乔木层、灌木层、草本层和群落总体的Bray-Curtis指数最大.
以空間代替時間的方法選取典型樣地,採用常規群落學調查方法對巑江流域巖溶區立地條件基本一緻的檵木(Loropetalum chinense)群落不同恢複階段的植物物種組成及其多樣性變化進行研究.結果錶明,(1)在所調查的樣方中,共記錄維管束植物78種,隸屬于45科70屬.喬木層的建群種檵木隨著群落的恢複其重要值有降低的趨勢,而在灌木層則相反.檵木群落不同恢複階段喬木層和灌木層主要優勢種為檵木、小巴豆(Croton xiaopadou)、龍鬚籐(Bauhinia championii)、紅揹山痳桿(Alchornea trewioides)和紫凌木(Decaspermum esquirolii),草本層主要優勢種為狹穗薹草(Carex ischnostachya)、廬山香科科(Teucrium pernyi)和蔓生莠竹(Microstegium fasciculatum).(2)隨著檵木群落的恢複,群落總體、喬木層和灌木層物種豐富度呈現增大的趨勢,草本層則相反;Shannon指數和均勻度指數具有一緻的變化趨勢,喬木層Shannon指數和均勻度指數隨檵木群落的恢複呈現增大的趨勢,而灌木層、草本層和群落總體則相反.檵木群落不同恢複階段灌木層Shannon指數均高于喬木層和草本層,而草本層均勻度指數均高于喬木層和灌木層;Simpson指數隨檵木群落恢複的變化趨勢與Shannon指數和均勻度指數相反.(3)在檵木群落的灌木階段、喬灌階段和喬林階段這3箇恢複階段中,喬灌階段與喬林階段之間的喬木層、灌木層、草本層和群落總體的Bray-Curtis指數最大.
이공간대체시간적방법선취전형양지,채용상규군락학조사방법대리강류역암용구입지조건기본일치적계목(Loropetalum chinense)군락불동회복계단적식물물충조성급기다양성변화진행연구.결과표명,(1)재소조사적양방중,공기록유관속식물78충,대속우45과70속.교목층적건군충계목수착군락적회복기중요치유강저적추세,이재관목층칙상반.계목군락불동회복계단교목층화관목층주요우세충위계목、소파두(Croton xiaopadou)、룡수등(Bauhinia championii)、홍배산마간(Alchornea trewioides)화자릉목(Decaspermum esquirolii),초본층주요우세충위협수대초(Carex ischnostachya)、려산향과과(Teucrium pernyi)화만생유죽(Microstegium fasciculatum).(2)수착계목군락적회복,군락총체、교목층화관목층물충봉부도정현증대적추세,초본층칙상반;Shannon지수화균균도지수구유일치적변화추세,교목층Shannon지수화균균도지수수계목군락적회복정현증대적추세,이관목층、초본층화군락총체칙상반.계목군락불동회복계단관목층Shannon지수균고우교목층화초본층,이초본층균균도지수균고우교목층화관목층;Simpson지수수계목군락회복적변화추세여Shannon지수화균균도지수상반.(3)재계목군락적관목계단、교관계단화교림계단저3개회복계단중,교관계단여교림계단지간적교목층、관목층、초본층화군락총체적Bray-Curtis지수최대.
By adopting the concept of space as a substitute for time, we analyzed the changes of plant species composition and diversity of different restoration stages of Loropetalum chinense communities distributing in the karst area in Lijiang River valley. The results showed that, (1) we recorded 78 species of vascular plants from 45 families and 70 genera. The important value of Loropetalum chinense as the role of constructive species had a decreased trend in arborous layer, and the reverse trend in shrub layer. The main dominant species of arborous layer and shrub layer in different restoration stages of Loropetalum chinense communities were Loropetalum chinense, Croton xiaopadou, Bauhinia championii, Alchornea trewioides, Decaspermum esquirolii, and the main dominant species of herb layer were Cyperus compressus, Teucrium pernyi, Microstegium vimineum. (2) Species richness had an increased trend with community, arborous layer and shrub layer during Loropetalum chinense communities restoration, and the reverse trend in herb layer. Shannon index and evenness index had the accordant trend. Shannon index and evenness index of arborous layer had an increased trend with Loropetalum chinense communities restoration, a reverse trend accurred in the shrub layer, herb layer and community. The value of Shannon index in shrub layer was higher than in arborous layer and herb layer of the three different restoration stages, and the value of evenness index of herb layer was higher than arborous layer and shrub layer. The change of Simpson index with Loropetalum chinense communities restoration had the reverse trend to the Shannon index or evenness index. (3) Of the three restoration stage of Loropetalum chinense communities, the value of the Bray-Curtis index of arborous layer, shrub layer, herb layer and community between shrub to tree stage and tree stage were the maximum.