CAJ | 학술논문

确认不侵犯专利权之诉属于消极的确认之诉,人民法院受理此类案件应当从是否具备消极确认之诉的利益和起诉条件两个方面进行审查.关于诉的利益审查主要注重权利人的警告或威胁是否存在,而不应注重是否已给被控人带来实际不利益.关于起诉条件,原告既可以是被警告人本人,也可以是利害关系人;既可以是已经进行生产、销售相关产品的人,也可以是正在投资建厂或准备投资建厂的人.当专利权利人已经在合理期限内寻求行政救济时,人民法院不能受理确认不侵权之诉.
학인불침범전리권지소속우소겁적학인지소,인민법원수리차류안건응당종시부구비소겁학인지소적이익화기소조건량개방면진행심사.관우소적이익심사주요주중권리인적경고혹위협시부존재,이불응주중시부이급피공인대래실제불이익.관우기소조건,원고기가이시피경고인본인,야가이시리해관계인;기가이시이경진행생산、소수상관산품적인,야가이시정재투자건엄혹준비투자건엄적인.당전리권리인이경재합리기한내심구행정구제시,인민법원불능수리학인불침권지소.
Confirming no infringement of the patent right action belongs to the negative confirmation suit, the people's court review of such cases should have the negative confirmation suit and the interests of the prosecution condition two aspects.Interest review about litigation mainly focus on whether the warnings or threats, and should not pay attention to whether the accused has not brought real interest.On the prosecution condition, the plaintiff can be warned himself, also can be a stakeholder;can be had for production, sales of related products, also can be to invest and build factories or are ready to invest and build factories.When a patent right has been seeking administrative relief within a reasonable period of time, the people's court cannot accept the affirmation of no tort.