佳木斯教育学院学报
佳木斯教育學院學報
가목사교육학원학보
JOURNAL OF JUAMJUSI EDUCATION INSTITUTE
2013年
1期
233-234
,共2页
反事实思维%情绪获益%行为获益%计划行为理论
反事實思維%情緒穫益%行為穫益%計劃行為理論
반사실사유%정서획익%행위획익%계화행위이론
counterfactual thinking%emotional benefit%behavior benefit%theory of planned behavior
采用顺序启动范式,以负性事情为材料,通过对80名被试的测量,两个实验考察了反事实思维的功能说.结果发现:(1)可控性任务中,个体偏向于行为获益,且行为获益的思考时间小于情绪获准;(2)不可控任务中,个体偏向于情绪获益,且情绪获益的选择时间小于行为获益;(3)任务不同,反事实思维的功能不一样.
採用順序啟動範式,以負性事情為材料,通過對80名被試的測量,兩箇實驗攷察瞭反事實思維的功能說.結果髮現:(1)可控性任務中,箇體偏嚮于行為穫益,且行為穫益的思攷時間小于情緒穫準;(2)不可控任務中,箇體偏嚮于情緒穫益,且情緒穫益的選擇時間小于行為穫益;(3)任務不同,反事實思維的功能不一樣.
채용순서계동범식,이부성사정위재료,통과대80명피시적측량,량개실험고찰료반사실사유적공능설.결과발현:(1)가공성임무중,개체편향우행위획익,차행위획익적사고시간소우정서획준;(2)불가공임무중,개체편향우정서획익,차정서획익적선택시간소우행위획익;(3)임무불동,반사실사유적공능불일양.
Using sequential priming paradigm, the negative things as material, through the measurement of 80 subjects, two experiments examine the function of counterfactual thinking. The results show:(1) In controllable task, individuals tend to behavior benefit, benefit less than emotional allowed;(2) In the uncontrollable task, individuals tend to choose the emotional benefit, benefit less than behavior benefit;(3) different tasks, the function is not the same as the counterfactual thinking.