技术经济与管理研究
技術經濟與管理研究
기술경제여관리연구
TECHNOECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
2013年
4期
27-30
,共4页
运输物流%上市公司%投入产出%物流业%DEA
運輸物流%上市公司%投入產齣%物流業%DEA
운수물류%상시공사%투입산출%물류업%DEA
Transport logistics%Listed companies%Input-output%Logistics industry%Data envelopment analysis
近年来,中国物流业得到了突飞猛进的发展,成为推动我国经济成长的新亮点.但运作效率较低、成本较高等因素制约着物流业的发展.本文以2011年中国运输物流上市公司的相关数据为样本,利用数据包络分析法,从投入产出角度对其经营绩效进行了分析评价.结果表明,我国运输物流企业的经营绩效已处于相对较高的水平,2011年的综合效率平均得分达到0.901,纯技术效率平均得分为0.942,规模效率平均得分为0.956;但从总体来看, DEA有效率偏低,2011年度38家运输物流上市公司(剔除数据不完备的3家)中仅有14家达到DEA有效,占总体的比重为36.84%.最后根据DEA分析的结论,本文提出通过采取降低成本费用、精简员工、控制企业规模等措施来提高公司经营绩效和实现资源配置最优的政策建议.
近年來,中國物流業得到瞭突飛猛進的髮展,成為推動我國經濟成長的新亮點.但運作效率較低、成本較高等因素製約著物流業的髮展.本文以2011年中國運輸物流上市公司的相關數據為樣本,利用數據包絡分析法,從投入產齣角度對其經營績效進行瞭分析評價.結果錶明,我國運輸物流企業的經營績效已處于相對較高的水平,2011年的綜閤效率平均得分達到0.901,純技術效率平均得分為0.942,規模效率平均得分為0.956;但從總體來看, DEA有效率偏低,2011年度38傢運輸物流上市公司(剔除數據不完備的3傢)中僅有14傢達到DEA有效,佔總體的比重為36.84%.最後根據DEA分析的結論,本文提齣通過採取降低成本費用、精簡員工、控製企業規模等措施來提高公司經營績效和實現資源配置最優的政策建議.
근년래,중국물류업득도료돌비맹진적발전,성위추동아국경제성장적신량점.단운작효솔교저、성본교고등인소제약착물류업적발전.본문이2011년중국운수물류상시공사적상관수거위양본,이용수거포락분석법,종투입산출각도대기경영적효진행료분석평개.결과표명,아국운수물류기업적경영적효이처우상대교고적수평,2011년적종합효솔평균득분체도0.901,순기술효솔평균득분위0.942,규모효솔평균득분위0.956;단종총체래간, DEA유효솔편저,2011년도38가운수물류상시공사(척제수거불완비적3가)중부유14가체도DEA유효,점총체적비중위36.84%.최후근거DEA분석적결론,본문제출통과채취강저성본비용、정간원공、공제기업규모등조시래제고공사경영적효화실현자원배치최우적정책건의.
The development of logistics industry of China has advanced rapidly in recent years, and it has become the new bright-ness of China's economic growth. But Lower efficiency, higher cost and some other factors restrict the development of logistics industry. This article analyzes the operating performances of Chinese transport and logistics listed companies by the DEA model, which based on the data of 2011. The results show that the operating performances of the transport and logistics listed companies have been at a relative-ly high level. The average of overall efficiency is 0.901. The average of pure technical efficiency is 0.942. The average of scale efficiency is 0.956. But the efficiency of DEA is low, only having 14 effective companies among the 38 companies,accounting for 36.84% of the overall. Finally, according to the conclusions of DEA analysis, it inspires the companies should adopt to reduce costs, streamline staff and control scale in order to improve operating performance and achieve optimum of resource distribution.