潍坊医学院学报
濰坊醫學院學報
유방의학원학보
JOURNAL OF WEIFANG MEDICAL COLLEGE
2012年
6期
443-445
,共3页
吴红*%李贵新%刘康%傅玲%路中%孙秀梅%黄琰%马长庚%刘锦
吳紅*%李貴新%劉康%傅玲%路中%孫秀梅%黃琰%馬長庚%劉錦
오홍*%리귀신%류강%부령%로중%손수매%황염%마장경%류금
胃肿瘤%腹腔积液%射频热疗%顺铂
胃腫瘤%腹腔積液%射頻熱療%順鉑
위종류%복강적액%사빈열료%순박
Gastric cancer%Ascites%Radio frequency hyperthermia%Cisplatin
目的观察射频热疗联合腹腔顺铂灌注化疗对胃癌腹腔积液患者的临床疗效.方法比较54例应用射频热疗联合顺铂治疗后的胃癌腹腔积液患者与30例未应用射频热疗仅应用顺铂灌注化疗后的胃癌腹腔积液患者的临床疗效.结果治疗组与对照组的有效率分别为40.74%,26.67%,差异有显著性(P<0.05).毒副反应较轻,主要为轻、中度的骨髓抑制及消化道反应,偶有发热,治疗组与对照组差异无显著性(P>0.05).随访显示,热疗组:随访时间最长为24个月,有效病例的中位生存时间8.8个月.非热疗组:随访时间最长为24个月,有效病例的中位生存时间5.3个月.结论射频透热治疗联合腹腔顺铂灌注化疗治疗胃癌腹腔积液比单纯腹腔灌注顺铂化疗疗效高,是恶性腹腔积液安全、有效的治疗手段.
目的觀察射頻熱療聯閤腹腔順鉑灌註化療對胃癌腹腔積液患者的臨床療效.方法比較54例應用射頻熱療聯閤順鉑治療後的胃癌腹腔積液患者與30例未應用射頻熱療僅應用順鉑灌註化療後的胃癌腹腔積液患者的臨床療效.結果治療組與對照組的有效率分彆為40.74%,26.67%,差異有顯著性(P<0.05).毒副反應較輕,主要為輕、中度的骨髓抑製及消化道反應,偶有髮熱,治療組與對照組差異無顯著性(P>0.05).隨訪顯示,熱療組:隨訪時間最長為24箇月,有效病例的中位生存時間8.8箇月.非熱療組:隨訪時間最長為24箇月,有效病例的中位生存時間5.3箇月.結論射頻透熱治療聯閤腹腔順鉑灌註化療治療胃癌腹腔積液比單純腹腔灌註順鉑化療療效高,是噁性腹腔積液安全、有效的治療手段.
목적관찰사빈열료연합복강순박관주화료대위암복강적액환자적림상료효.방법비교54례응용사빈열료연합순박치료후적위암복강적액환자여30례미응용사빈열료부응용순박관주화료후적위암복강적액환자적림상료효.결과치료조여대조조적유효솔분별위40.74%,26.67%,차이유현저성(P<0.05).독부반응교경,주요위경、중도적골수억제급소화도반응,우유발열,치료조여대조조차이무현저성(P>0.05).수방현시,열료조:수방시간최장위24개월,유효병례적중위생존시간8.8개월.비열료조:수방시간최장위24개월,유효병례적중위생존시간5.3개월.결론사빈투열치료연합복강순박관주화료치료위암복강적액비단순복강관주순박화료료효고,시악성복강적액안전、유효적치료수단.
Objective To explore the clinical significance of radio frequency heat treatment combined with celiac cisplatin perfusion chemotherapy for gastric cancer peritoneal effusion .Methods The clinical significance was compared of 54 applications treated by radio frequency hyperthermia combined with cisplatin perfusion chemotherapy and 30 applications treated by cisplatin perfusion chemotherapy only with malignant ascites in patients with gastric cancer . Results The efficient of the treatment group and the control group were 40.74% and 26.67% respectively,there was significant difference(P<0.05).Side reactions were light,mainly for the light or moderate bone marrow suppression , gastrointestinal reaction and occasional fever .The treatment group and the control group had no significant difference (P>0.05).Follow-up showed that hyperthermia group:follow-up time of effective cases up to 24 months,the median sur-vival time was 8.8 months.Non-hyperthermia group:Follow-up of effective cases time up to 24 months,the median sur-vival time was 5.3 months.Conclusion Radio frequency hyperthermia diathermy therapy combined with celiac cispaltin perfusion chemotherapy has a high curative effect to stomach cancer patients with malignant ascites than cisplatin perfu -sion chemotherapy alone,which is a malignant ascites safe ,effective treatment.