中国组织工程研究
中國組織工程研究
중국조직공정연구
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
2012年
48期
8938-8942
,共5页
王红%岳瑞宏%周海宇%王栓科%汪静%马靖琳
王紅%嶽瑞宏%週海宇%王栓科%汪靜%馬靖琳
왕홍%악서굉%주해우%왕전과%왕정%마정림
假体型号%人工髋关节置换%测量%模板%软件
假體型號%人工髖關節置換%測量%模闆%軟件
가체형호%인공관관절치환%측량%모판%연건
背景:人工关节的脱位、松动、活动度未如理想等除与材料因素及术者技术相关外,还与假体大小型号等的选择有密切关系.目的:探讨人工髋关节置换术前模板测量软件的研发和初步临床应用的结果.方法:132例患者随机分为2组,分别使用课题组研发人工髋关节置换模板测量软件或传统方法对其髋关节置换过程中实际采用的假体型号行置换前预测,比较二者吻合率.结果与结论:通过人工髋关节置换模板测量软件选取的假体型号符合率为86.36%,而传统方法选取的假体型号得吻合率仅为71.97%,差异有显著性意义(χ2=13.794,P <0.001).软件置换前预测臼杯型号同置换中应用臼杯型号之间存在相关性(r=1.0000,P=0.015),软件置换前预测假体柄型号同置换中应用假体柄型号之间存在相关性(r=0.9999, P=0.029).说明数字化人工髋关节模板置换前测量软件研发成功,初步临床应用效果良好.
揹景:人工關節的脫位、鬆動、活動度未如理想等除與材料因素及術者技術相關外,還與假體大小型號等的選擇有密切關繫.目的:探討人工髖關節置換術前模闆測量軟件的研髮和初步臨床應用的結果.方法:132例患者隨機分為2組,分彆使用課題組研髮人工髖關節置換模闆測量軟件或傳統方法對其髖關節置換過程中實際採用的假體型號行置換前預測,比較二者吻閤率.結果與結論:通過人工髖關節置換模闆測量軟件選取的假體型號符閤率為86.36%,而傳統方法選取的假體型號得吻閤率僅為71.97%,差異有顯著性意義(χ2=13.794,P <0.001).軟件置換前預測臼杯型號同置換中應用臼杯型號之間存在相關性(r=1.0000,P=0.015),軟件置換前預測假體柄型號同置換中應用假體柄型號之間存在相關性(r=0.9999, P=0.029).說明數字化人工髖關節模闆置換前測量軟件研髮成功,初步臨床應用效果良好.
배경:인공관절적탈위、송동、활동도미여이상등제여재료인소급술자기술상관외,환여가체대소형호등적선택유밀절관계.목적:탐토인공관관절치환술전모판측량연건적연발화초보림상응용적결과.방법:132례환자수궤분위2조,분별사용과제조연발인공관관절치환모판측량연건혹전통방법대기관관절치환과정중실제채용적가체형호행치환전예측,비교이자문합솔.결과여결론:통과인공관관절치환모판측량연건선취적가체형호부합솔위86.36%,이전통방법선취적가체형호득문합솔부위71.97%,차이유현저성의의(χ2=13.794,P <0.001).연건치환전예측구배형호동치환중응용구배형호지간존재상관성(r=1.0000,P=0.015),연건치환전예측가체병형호동치환중응용가체병형호지간존재상관성(r=0.9999, P=0.029).설명수자화인공관관절모판치환전측량연건연발성공,초보림상응용효과량호.
BACKGROUND: The dislocation, loosening, activity of artificial joint associated with the material factors and the surgeon technologies, but also closely related with the choice of prosthesis sizes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the research of the software for measuring template before total hip replacement and its reliability in initial clinical application. METHODS: 132 patients were divided into two groups, the preoperative measurement of the prosthesis model that actual y used in the process of hip replacement was performed with the research and development total hip replacement template measurement software or traditional methods respectively, and final y compared the above results with the practical application at surgery. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The coincidence rate of prosthesis model measured by the software was 86.36%while coincidence rate of prosthesis model measured by traditional methods was 71.97%, the difference was statistical y significant (χ2=13.794, P < 0.001). There was significant correlation between software predicted preoperative acetabular prosthesis model and intraoperative acetabular prosthesis model (r=1.000 0, P=0.015), and software predicted preoperative femoral prosthesis model was significantly correlated with the intraoperative application of femoral prosthesis (r=0.999 9, P=0.029). The software for preoperative measuring is devised successful y, and the initial clinical application is wel .