中国组织工程研究
中國組織工程研究
중국조직공정연구
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
2012年
52期
9766-9770
,共5页
李大刚%苏培基%陈敢峰%陈世忠%高恒
李大剛%囌培基%陳敢峰%陳世忠%高恆
리대강%소배기%진감봉%진세충%고항
骨质疏松%椎体压缩性骨折%椎体成形%椎体后凸成形%并发症%系统评价%骨水泥%渗漏
骨質疏鬆%椎體壓縮性骨摺%椎體成形%椎體後凸成形%併髮癥%繫統評價%骨水泥%滲漏
골질소송%추체압축성골절%추체성형%추체후철성형%병발증%계통평개%골수니%삼루
背景:椎体成形和椎体后凸成形是治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的微创方法.
目的:评价椎体成形和椎体后凸成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的安全性.
方法:计算机检索Medline、EMBASE、中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库1990年1月至2012年1月有关椎体成形和椎体后凸成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折并发症的文献.
结果与结论:检索出62篇文献,8993例患者.椎体成形和椎体后凸成形治疗的穿刺手术并发症与其他并发症差异无显著性意义.椎体成形治疗的骨水泥渗漏率、新发骨折率高于椎体后凸成形治疗(P=0.00006,P=0.02);二者的相邻椎体骨折率差异无显著性意义.表明椎体成形和椎体后凸成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的严重并发症非常低,两种治疗方式相邻椎体骨折率、穿刺手术并发症及其他并发症无明显差异,但椎体后凸成形治疗后骨水泥渗漏、新发骨折率低于椎体成形治疗,此次系统评价结果尚需要大样本前瞻性研究证实.
揹景:椎體成形和椎體後凸成形是治療骨質疏鬆性椎體壓縮骨摺的微創方法.
目的:評價椎體成形和椎體後凸成形治療骨質疏鬆性椎體壓縮骨摺的安全性.
方法:計算機檢索Medline、EMBASE、中國知網、維普數據庫、萬方數據庫1990年1月至2012年1月有關椎體成形和椎體後凸成形治療骨質疏鬆性椎體壓縮骨摺併髮癥的文獻.
結果與結論:檢索齣62篇文獻,8993例患者.椎體成形和椎體後凸成形治療的穿刺手術併髮癥與其他併髮癥差異無顯著性意義.椎體成形治療的骨水泥滲漏率、新髮骨摺率高于椎體後凸成形治療(P=0.00006,P=0.02);二者的相鄰椎體骨摺率差異無顯著性意義.錶明椎體成形和椎體後凸成形治療骨質疏鬆性椎體壓縮骨摺的嚴重併髮癥非常低,兩種治療方式相鄰椎體骨摺率、穿刺手術併髮癥及其他併髮癥無明顯差異,但椎體後凸成形治療後骨水泥滲漏、新髮骨摺率低于椎體成形治療,此次繫統評價結果尚需要大樣本前瞻性研究證實.
배경:추체성형화추체후철성형시치료골질소송성추체압축골절적미창방법.
목적:평개추체성형화추체후철성형치료골질소송성추체압축골절적안전성.
방법:계산궤검색Medline、EMBASE、중국지망、유보수거고、만방수거고1990년1월지2012년1월유관추체성형화추체후철성형치료골질소송성추체압축골절병발증적문헌.
결과여결론:검색출62편문헌,8993례환자.추체성형화추체후철성형치료적천자수술병발증여기타병발증차이무현저성의의.추체성형치료적골수니삼루솔、신발골절솔고우추체후철성형치료(P=0.00006,P=0.02);이자적상린추체골절솔차이무현저성의의.표명추체성형화추체후철성형치료골질소송성추체압축골절적엄중병발증비상저,량충치료방식상린추체골절솔、천자수술병발증급기타병발증무명현차이,단추체후철성형치료후골수니삼루、신발골절솔저우추체성형치료,차차계통평개결과상수요대양본전첨성연구증실.
BACKGROUND:Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are minimal y invasive surgeries for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. @@@@OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the safety of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. @@@@METHODS:A search was conducted using Medline database, EMBASE database, CNKI database, Wanfang database and VIP database from January 1990 to January 2012 for the articles on the complications after osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures treated with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. @@@@RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:A total of 62 studies and 8 993 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference of puncture complications and other complications between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. The rates of cement leakage and new vertebral compression fractures of vertebroplasty were higher than those of kyphoplasty (P=0.000 06, P=0.02);there was no significant difference of adjacent vertebral fractures rate between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. The results demonstrate that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are two minimal y invasive methods for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. There was no significant difference of adjacent vertebral fractures rate, puncture complications and other complications between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, but the cement leakage and new vertebral compression fractures of kyphoplasty were lower than those of vertebroplasty. So, future prospective studies with a large number of patients are needed for the systematic review.