CAJ | 학술논문

要:对行政诉讼制度而言,应逐渐将包括高等学校在内的行使公共职能组织的管理行为纳入受案范围,打破此类组织自身对纠纷解决的垄断和对司法审查的排斥.而司法在高校行政案件审查时,也应当保持司法谦抑和自制,适当尊重高校自主权,减少司法干预学术的嫌疑.司法的谦抑和自制,在受案范围、受理时机、审查依据、审查强度、裁判方式等诸多方面,都应当予以体现和坚持.
요:대행정소송제도이언,응축점장포괄고등학교재내적행사공공직능조직적관리행위납입수안범위,타파차류조직자신대규분해결적롱단화대사법심사적배척.이사법재고교행정안건심사시,야응당보지사법겸억화자제,괄당존중고교자주권,감소사법간예학술적혐의.사법적겸억화자제,재수안범위、수리시궤、심사의거、심사강도、재판방식등제다방면,도응당여이체현화견지.
For administrative litigation system, management behavior of organizations including higher learning institutions exercising public functions should be gradually incorporated into the scope of cases accepted, in order to break their dispute resolution monopoly and judicial review exclusion. While in university administrative case review, judicature should also maintain judicial humility and self-control to properly respect university autonomy and reduce suspicion of its academic intervention. Judicial humility and self-control should be reflected and adhered to in many aspects, including the scope of cases accepted, acceptance time, review basis, review intensity, judgment mode, etc.