中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2013年
8期
19-20
,共2页
腹腔镜%开腹手术%胆囊结石%临床疗效
腹腔鏡%開腹手術%膽囊結石%臨床療效
복강경%개복수술%담낭결석%림상료효
Laparoscopic%Open cholecystectomy operation%Gallstone%Clinical curative effect
目的:比较腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果.方法:选取本院2011年6月-2012年6月间治疗的78例胆囊结石患者为研究对象,分别采用腹腔镜和开腹手术的方法对患者实施治疗,对治疗效果进行了比较分析.结果:腹腔镜组术中出血量、排气时间、下床活动时间、术后进食时间、住院时间均优于开腹手术组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:在治疗胆囊结石的过程中,腹腔镜创伤小,恢复快,并发症较少,患者接受度高,是临床治疗胆囊结石的较好选择之一.
目的:比較腹腔鏡和開腹手術治療膽囊結石的臨床效果.方法:選取本院2011年6月-2012年6月間治療的78例膽囊結石患者為研究對象,分彆採用腹腔鏡和開腹手術的方法對患者實施治療,對治療效果進行瞭比較分析.結果:腹腔鏡組術中齣血量、排氣時間、下床活動時間、術後進食時間、住院時間均優于開腹手術組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論:在治療膽囊結石的過程中,腹腔鏡創傷小,恢複快,併髮癥較少,患者接受度高,是臨床治療膽囊結石的較好選擇之一.
목적:비교복강경화개복수술치료담낭결석적림상효과.방법:선취본원2011년6월-2012년6월간치료적78례담낭결석환자위연구대상,분별채용복강경화개복수술적방법대환자실시치료,대치료효과진행료비교분석.결과:복강경조술중출혈량、배기시간、하상활동시간、술후진식시간、주원시간균우우개복수술조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론:재치료담낭결석적과정중,복강경창상소,회복쾌,병발증교소,환자접수도고,시림상치료담낭결석적교호선택지일.
Objective:To compare clinical effect of laparoscopic and open operation in treatment of cholecystolithiasis.Method:78 cases of patients with gallbladder stones were selected as the research object from June 2011 to June 2012,using laparoscopic and open operation method of patient treatment,the therapeutic effect was compared and analyzed. Result:Laparoscopy group 39 cases intraoperative bleeding,discharge time,ambulation, postoperative feeding time,hospitalization time between group comparison of laparoscopic group were superior to the open operation group,the difference has statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of gallbladder stones in the process,the laparoscopic approach less trauma,quicker recovery,less complications,patients receiving high,clinical treatment of gallbladder stones is one of the better choices.