中国医学影像学杂志
中國醫學影像學雜誌
중국의학영상학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING
2013年
1期
24-26
,共3页
赵张平%朱文玲%陈世沛%滕红%严天军%李剑波
趙張平%硃文玲%陳世沛%滕紅%嚴天軍%李劍波
조장평%주문령%진세패%등홍%엄천군%리검파
肺肿瘤%肿瘤复发%数字断层融合%放射摄影术,胸部
肺腫瘤%腫瘤複髮%數字斷層融閤%放射攝影術,胸部
폐종류%종류복발%수자단층융합%방사섭영술,흉부
Lung neoplasms%Neoplasm recurrence%Digital tomosynthesis%Radiography, thoracic
目的探讨胸部数字断层融合(DTS)检查对恶性肿瘤肺转移结节的诊断和随访价值.资料与方法对257例恶性肿瘤患者进行胸部 DTS 检查和数字 X 线摄影(DR)检查,以多层螺旋 CT 作为参照,比较 DTS 和 DR 对肺转移结节的检出情况,评估 DTS 对肺转移结节的诊断效能.结果257例患者中,34例发生肺转移,共确认187个转移结节.DR 检出16例共计65个结节,DTS 检出31例共计164个结节.DR 和 DTS 对恶性肿瘤肺转移的诊断敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为47.1%、87.9%、37.2%、91.6%和91.2%、99.6%、96.9%、98.7%.DTS 对直径<5 mm 和5~10 mm 的肺转移结节的检出率明显高于 DR(P<0.01).结论 DTS较 DR 对肺转移结节具有更高的敏感性,可用于转移性肺癌的诊断和随访.
目的探討胸部數字斷層融閤(DTS)檢查對噁性腫瘤肺轉移結節的診斷和隨訪價值.資料與方法對257例噁性腫瘤患者進行胸部 DTS 檢查和數字 X 線攝影(DR)檢查,以多層螺鏇 CT 作為參照,比較 DTS 和 DR 對肺轉移結節的檢齣情況,評估 DTS 對肺轉移結節的診斷效能.結果257例患者中,34例髮生肺轉移,共確認187箇轉移結節.DR 檢齣16例共計65箇結節,DTS 檢齣31例共計164箇結節.DR 和 DTS 對噁性腫瘤肺轉移的診斷敏感性、特異性、暘性預測值、陰性預測值分彆為47.1%、87.9%、37.2%、91.6%和91.2%、99.6%、96.9%、98.7%.DTS 對直徑<5 mm 和5~10 mm 的肺轉移結節的檢齣率明顯高于 DR(P<0.01).結論 DTS較 DR 對肺轉移結節具有更高的敏感性,可用于轉移性肺癌的診斷和隨訪.
목적탐토흉부수자단층융합(DTS)검사대악성종류폐전이결절적진단화수방개치.자료여방법대257례악성종류환자진행흉부 DTS 검사화수자 X 선섭영(DR)검사,이다층라선 CT 작위삼조,비교 DTS 화 DR 대폐전이결절적검출정황,평고 DTS 대폐전이결절적진단효능.결과257례환자중,34례발생폐전이,공학인187개전이결절.DR 검출16례공계65개결절,DTS 검출31례공계164개결절.DR 화 DTS 대악성종류폐전이적진단민감성、특이성、양성예측치、음성예측치분별위47.1%、87.9%、37.2%、91.6%화91.2%、99.6%、96.9%、98.7%.DTS 대직경<5 mm 화5~10 mm 적폐전이결절적검출솔명현고우 DR(P<0.01).결론 DTS교 DR 대폐전이결절구유경고적민감성,가용우전이성폐암적진단화수방.
Purpose To explore the value of chest digital tomosynthesis (DTS) in the diagnosis and follow-up of pulmonary metastasis nodules. Materials and Methods 257 patients with primary malignant tumor were recruited in the study. Chest DTS and digital radiography (DR) were performed in all patients. Multidetector CT was served as golden standard. Detection rate of chest DTS and DR was compared, and the diagnostic efficiency of DTS for pulmonary metastasis nodules was evaluated. Results Among the 257 patients, 187 metastasis nodules were found in 34 patients. 16 patients with 65 nodules were detected on chest DR, and 31 patients with 164 nodules were detected on chest DTS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of chest DR were 47.1%, 87.9%, 37.2% and 91.6%, respectively, and those of DTS were 91.2%, 99.6%, 96.9%and 98.7%, respectively. The detection rates of DTS in detecting pulmonary metastasis nodules with diameter less than 5 mm and 5-10 mm were statistically higher than those of DR (P<0.01). Conclusion Chest DTS is better than chest DR in detecting pulmonary metastasis nodules, it can be a practicable conventional technique for detection and follow-up of pulmonary cancer.