中国医药导刊
中國醫藥導刊
중국의약도간
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GUIDE
2012年
12期
2115-2116
,共2页
儿童呼吸道感染%头孢羟氨苄咀嚼片%头孢羟氨苄普通片%疗效
兒童呼吸道感染%頭孢羥氨芐咀嚼片%頭孢羥氨芐普通片%療效
인동호흡도감염%두포간안변저작편%두포간안변보통편%료효
Children's respiratory infections%Cephalosporins hydroxyl ampicillin chewing flakes%Cephalosporins hydroxyl ampicillin ordinary sheets%Curative effect
目的:对比头孢羟氨苄咀嚼片和普通片治疗儿童呼吸道感染的疗效,分析头孢羟氨苄咀嚼片的治疗优势.方法:选取50例呼吸道感染儿童为研究对象,按照入院顺序随机分为观察组和对照组各25例,观察组患儿给予头孢羟氨苄咀嚼片,对照组患儿给予头孢羟氨苄普通片,观察两种治疗效果,安全性以及患儿及家长接受程度.结果:1.观察组总有效率(84.0%)高于对照组(84.0%),但比较差异有统计学意义(P>0.05).进行各病种间比较发现,观察组急性扁桃体炎治疗有效率为85.71%高于对照组的75.0%,但比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而急性支气管炎、支气管肺炎和其他呼吸道感染治疗有效率观察组与对照组间比较无明显差异,比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).2.观察组不良反应发生率8.0%,低于对照组的28.0%,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).3.观察组患儿服药后主观感受评分4.2±0.6,高于对照组患儿服药后主观感受评分(2.4±0.5),比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:与普通片相比,头孢羟氨苄咀嚼片疗效较好、不良反应发生率低,而且方便服用,价格合理,容易被患儿及家长接受.
目的:對比頭孢羥氨芐咀嚼片和普通片治療兒童呼吸道感染的療效,分析頭孢羥氨芐咀嚼片的治療優勢.方法:選取50例呼吸道感染兒童為研究對象,按照入院順序隨機分為觀察組和對照組各25例,觀察組患兒給予頭孢羥氨芐咀嚼片,對照組患兒給予頭孢羥氨芐普通片,觀察兩種治療效果,安全性以及患兒及傢長接受程度.結果:1.觀察組總有效率(84.0%)高于對照組(84.0%),但比較差異有統計學意義(P>0.05).進行各病種間比較髮現,觀察組急性扁桃體炎治療有效率為85.71%高于對照組的75.0%,但比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);而急性支氣管炎、支氣管肺炎和其他呼吸道感染治療有效率觀察組與對照組間比較無明顯差異,比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).2.觀察組不良反應髮生率8.0%,低于對照組的28.0%,比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).3.觀察組患兒服藥後主觀感受評分4.2±0.6,高于對照組患兒服藥後主觀感受評分(2.4±0.5),比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論:與普通片相比,頭孢羥氨芐咀嚼片療效較好、不良反應髮生率低,而且方便服用,價格閤理,容易被患兒及傢長接受.
목적:대비두포간안변저작편화보통편치료인동호흡도감염적료효,분석두포간안변저작편적치료우세.방법:선취50례호흡도감염인동위연구대상,안조입원순서수궤분위관찰조화대조조각25례,관찰조환인급여두포간안변저작편,대조조환인급여두포간안변보통편,관찰량충치료효과,안전성이급환인급가장접수정도.결과:1.관찰조총유효솔(84.0%)고우대조조(84.0%),단비교차이유통계학의의(P>0.05).진행각병충간비교발현,관찰조급성편도체염치료유효솔위85.71%고우대조조적75.0%,단비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);이급성지기관염、지기관폐염화기타호흡도감염치료유효솔관찰조여대조조간비교무명현차이,비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).2.관찰조불량반응발생솔8.0%,저우대조조적28.0%,비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).3.관찰조환인복약후주관감수평분4.2±0.6,고우대조조환인복약후주관감수평분(2.4±0.5),비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론:여보통편상비,두포간안변저작편료효교호、불량반응발생솔저,이차방편복용,개격합리,용역피환인급가장접수.
Objective:To contrast the curative effect of cephalosporins hydroxyl ampicillin chewing flakes and ordinary piece for treating children with respiratory tract infection, anf to analysis the therapeutic advantage of cephalosporins hydroxyl ampicillin chewing flakes. Methods:The 50 cases of respiratory infection children were selected as the research object, and were randomly divided into observation group and control group every 25 cases according to the order of hospital. The observation group was given to cephalosporins hydroxyl ampicillin chewing flakes treatmentm, the control group was given to hydroxyl ampicillin ordinary sheets treatment. We observed the therapeutic effect, safety and accept degree of children and parents. Results:1. The total effectiveness of observation group (88.0%) was higher than those in the control group(84.0%), and comparing statistical significance (P>0.05). The comparison between the disease, the total effectiveness about acute tonsillitis therapy of the observation group(85.71%) was higher than the control group(75.0%), and comparing statistical significance (P>0.05);And the total effectiveness differences about acute bronchitis, bronchitis and other respiratory infections therapy were no significant between the observation group and control group, comparing statistically significant (P>0.05). 2. The adverse reaction rate of observation group (8.0%) was lower than control group (28.0%), and comparing statistical significance (P<0.05). 3. The subjective feeling score after taking of observation group (4.2±0.6) was higher than those in the control group (2.4±0.5), comparing statistical significance (P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with ordinary piece, cephalosporins hydroxyl ampicillin chewing flakes has better effect, and lower adverse reactions, convenient use and price moderate, which is accepted easily by children and parents.
