中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2013年
1期
45-46
,共2页
周锋%魏桂良%肖如红%张忠
週鋒%魏桂良%肖如紅%張忠
주봉%위계량%초여홍%장충
依托醚酯%利多卡因胶浆%丙泊酚%食管静脉曲张套扎术
依託醚酯%利多卡因膠漿%丙泊酚%食管靜脈麯張套扎術
의탁미지%리다잡인효장%병박분%식관정맥곡장투찰술
Relying on ether ester%Lidocaine mortar%Propofol%Ligation of esophageal varices
目的比较丙泊酚和依托咪酯复合利多卡因胶浆在胃镜下食管静脉曲张套扎术中的效果.方法胃镜下行食管静脉曲张套扎术的患者60例,随机分为两组,每组30例:P 组静脉注射丙泊酚+口服利多卡因胶浆;E 组静脉注射依托醚酯+口服利多卡因胶浆.记录两组患者入室时、置镜前、置镜时、苏醒后各时间点 MAP、HR、SpO2及苏醒时间、不良反应情况.结果 P 组置镜前、置镜时、苏醒后各时点的血压较入室时降低,心率较入室时慢,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05).E 组置镜前、置镜时、苏醒后各时点的血压和心率与入室时比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05).两组意识完全恢复时间分别为(5.8±0.8)min,(5.9±0.9)min,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05).结论丙泊酚和依托咪酯复合利多卡因胶浆均可用于胃镜下食管静脉曲张套扎术,两者临床效果确切,不良反应少,但在血流动力学的稳定上,依托咪酯似乎更具优势.
目的比較丙泊酚和依託咪酯複閤利多卡因膠漿在胃鏡下食管靜脈麯張套扎術中的效果.方法胃鏡下行食管靜脈麯張套扎術的患者60例,隨機分為兩組,每組30例:P 組靜脈註射丙泊酚+口服利多卡因膠漿;E 組靜脈註射依託醚酯+口服利多卡因膠漿.記錄兩組患者入室時、置鏡前、置鏡時、囌醒後各時間點 MAP、HR、SpO2及囌醒時間、不良反應情況.結果 P 組置鏡前、置鏡時、囌醒後各時點的血壓較入室時降低,心率較入室時慢,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05).E 組置鏡前、置鏡時、囌醒後各時點的血壓和心率與入室時比較,差異無統計學意義(P >0.05).兩組意識完全恢複時間分彆為(5.8±0.8)min,(5.9±0.9)min,差異無統計學意義(P >0.05).結論丙泊酚和依託咪酯複閤利多卡因膠漿均可用于胃鏡下食管靜脈麯張套扎術,兩者臨床效果確切,不良反應少,但在血流動力學的穩定上,依託咪酯似乎更具優勢.
목적비교병박분화의탁미지복합리다잡인효장재위경하식관정맥곡장투찰술중적효과.방법위경하행식관정맥곡장투찰술적환자60례,수궤분위량조,매조30례:P 조정맥주사병박분+구복리다잡인효장;E 조정맥주사의탁미지+구복리다잡인효장.기록량조환자입실시、치경전、치경시、소성후각시간점 MAP、HR、SpO2급소성시간、불량반응정황.결과 P 조치경전、치경시、소성후각시점적혈압교입실시강저,심솔교입실시만,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05).E 조치경전、치경시、소성후각시점적혈압화심솔여입실시비교,차이무통계학의의(P >0.05).량조의식완전회복시간분별위(5.8±0.8)min,(5.9±0.9)min,차이무통계학의의(P >0.05).결론병박분화의탁미지복합리다잡인효장균가용우위경하식관정맥곡장투찰술,량자림상효과학절,불량반응소,단재혈류동역학적은정상,의탁미지사호경구우세.
Objective Comparing the effects of propofol and etomidate compound lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation. Method 60 patients for endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation were divided into two groups randomly. Group P received intravenous propofol combined with oral administration of lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage. Group E received intravenous etomidate with oral administration of lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage. Had recorded mean arterial pressures, heart rates and oxygen saturations at the time of before propofol or etomidate administration, endoscopy in front, after endoscopy in and after awaking. Recovery time and adverse reaction of all patients were recorded too. Result The mean arterial pressure and heart rate of group P at the time of endoscopy in front, after endoscopy in and after awaking decreased significantly than before propofol administration(P<0.05). Recovery time of group P and E were (5.8±0.8)min and (5.9±0.9)min, there was no difference(P>0.05). Conclusion Propofol and etomidate compound lidocaine hydrochloride mucilage can be used in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation, they are safety and effective, but etomidate is better an propofol in hemodynamic stability.