CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨 SKY 椎体后凸成形术与 PVP 对骨质疏松多椎体压缩骨折责任椎体选择性治疗的疗效对比,评价治疗骨质疏松多椎体压缩骨折责任椎体的有效方法.方法分别于术前、术后2周、术后6月、18个月进行疼痛强度视觉类比评分,观察患者的疼痛症状及生活治疗改善程度.结果52例手术均成功完成,每个椎体的骨水泥灌注量为3~6mL.两组手术方法术前、术后 VAS 评分 P 值分别<0.05,余比较不具统计学意义,两组手术方法术前、术后 SF-36评分 P 值分别<0.05,余比较不具统计学意义.结论无论是 SKY 椎体后凸成形术或 PVP 对骨质疏松多椎体压缩骨折选择性治疗均可取得良好的效果,相比 PVP,SKY 椎体后凸成形术更具优势,但价格昂贵,限制了它的使用.
목적탐토 SKY 추체후철성형술여 PVP 대골질소송다추체압축골절책임추체선택성치료적료효대비,평개치료골질소송다추체압축골절책임추체적유효방법.방법분별우술전、술후2주、술후6월、18개월진행동통강도시각류비평분,관찰환자적동통증상급생활치료개선정도.결과52례수술균성공완성,매개추체적골수니관주량위3~6mL.량조수술방법술전、술후 VAS 평분 P 치분별<0.05,여비교불구통계학의의,량조수술방법술전、술후 SF-36평분 P 치분별<0.05,여비교불구통계학의의.결론무론시 SKY 추체후철성형술혹 PVP 대골질소송다추체압축골절선택성치료균가취득량호적효과,상비 PVP,SKY 추체후철성형술경구우세,단개격앙귀,한제료타적사용.
Objective? Comprare the efficacy of SKY kyphoplasty with PVP treatment of osteoporosis, multiple vertebral compression fracture. Methods Preoperative, 2 weeks, 6 months, 18 months postoperative, used visual analog scale of pain intensity (visual analogue scale, VAS) and short form health questionnaire score (SF-36 summary tables) assess the quality of life improve. Results 52 cases were operated successfully with 3 ~~ 6ml bone cement perfusion. The VAS scores between two groups was P<0.05, It was not statistically significant, The SF-36 scores between two groups was P<0.05. Conclusion Both of the two methods have the good efficacy on the vertebral compression fracture.