中国医药指南
中國醫藥指南
중국의약지남
CHINA MEDICINE GUIDE
2013年
2期
417
,共1页
宫颈病变%薄层液基细胞学检查%宫颈涂片检查%诊断价值
宮頸病變%薄層液基細胞學檢查%宮頸塗片檢查%診斷價值
궁경병변%박층액기세포학검사%궁경도편검사%진단개치
Cervical lesions%Thin liquid based cytology%Cervical smear examination%Diagnosis value
目的探讨薄层液基细胞学检查、宫颈涂片检查对于宫颈病变的诊断作用,积累更多的临床诊断经验.方法本次研究随机性抽取了2010年6月至2012年6月,在我院妇产科接受治疗的患者资料,共详细收录了120例具备宫颈病变症状的患者.120例平均分为观察组、对照组,每组60例(n=60);观察组采用薄层液基细胞学检查法,对照组采用宫颈涂片检查法,根据患者具体情况而选用不同的方法.通过检查后确定的人数对比,判断2种方法应用于病变检查的确诊率,进而判断哪一种方法的诊断价值更高.结果观察组确诊率达98.3%,对照组确诊率达91.7%,两组确诊率相比的差异性显著(P<0.01).结论临床诊断宫颈病变应积极选用薄层液基细胞学检查法.
目的探討薄層液基細胞學檢查、宮頸塗片檢查對于宮頸病變的診斷作用,積纍更多的臨床診斷經驗.方法本次研究隨機性抽取瞭2010年6月至2012年6月,在我院婦產科接受治療的患者資料,共詳細收錄瞭120例具備宮頸病變癥狀的患者.120例平均分為觀察組、對照組,每組60例(n=60);觀察組採用薄層液基細胞學檢查法,對照組採用宮頸塗片檢查法,根據患者具體情況而選用不同的方法.通過檢查後確定的人數對比,判斷2種方法應用于病變檢查的確診率,進而判斷哪一種方法的診斷價值更高.結果觀察組確診率達98.3%,對照組確診率達91.7%,兩組確診率相比的差異性顯著(P<0.01).結論臨床診斷宮頸病變應積極選用薄層液基細胞學檢查法.
목적탐토박층액기세포학검사、궁경도편검사대우궁경병변적진단작용,적루경다적림상진단경험.방법본차연구수궤성추취료2010년6월지2012년6월,재아원부산과접수치료적환자자료,공상세수록료120례구비궁경병변증상적환자.120례평균분위관찰조、대조조,매조60례(n=60);관찰조채용박층액기세포학검사법,대조조채용궁경도편검사법,근거환자구체정황이선용불동적방법.통과검사후학정적인수대비,판단2충방법응용우병변검사적학진솔,진이판단나일충방법적진단개치경고.결과관찰조학진솔체98.3%,대조조학진솔체91.7%,량조학진솔상비적차이성현저(P<0.01).결론림상진단궁경병변응적겁선용박층액기세포학검사법.
Objective To investigate the ThinPrep liquid based cytology, cervical smears for the diagnosis of cervical lesions, the accumulation of more clinical diagnosis experience. Methods The study of random sample of 2010 June-2012 year in June, my courtyard department of gynaecology and obstetrics patients receiving treatment data, a total of 120 cases with detailed features of cervical lesions in asymptomatic patients. In 120 cases the average divided into the observation group and the control group, 60 cases in each group ( n=60 );group were treated by thinprep cytologic test method, the control group using a cervical smear test method, according to the situation of the patient and the choice of different ways. By examining the number of identified comparative, judge 2 kinds of method is applied to the lesion examination diagnosis rate, and then determine which method of more diagnostic value. Results The observation group confirmed diagnosis rate was 98%, the control group diagnosed rate reached 91%, two groups of diagnosis rate compared to the difference was significant (P<0.01). Conclusion The clinical diagnosis of cervical lesions should actively use of thinprep cytologic test method.