中国肿瘤临床
中國腫瘤臨床
중국종류림상
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2013年
1期
32-35
,共4页
肖宇%李鸿雁%马力文%张照辉%梁莉%王墨培%曹宝山
肖宇%李鴻雁%馬力文%張照輝%樑莉%王墨培%曹寶山
초우%리홍안%마력문%장조휘%량리%왕묵배%조보산
结直肠癌%肝动脉灌注%辅助化疗
結直腸癌%肝動脈灌註%輔助化療
결직장암%간동맥관주%보조화료
colorectal cancer%hepatic arterial infusion%chemotherapy
目的:通过与静脉辅助化疗对照,观察经肝动脉灌注联合静脉辅助化疗对Ⅲ期结直肠癌术后肝转移、无病生存期及总生存期的影响.方法:2002年1月至2006年3月,21例Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者作为治疗组,术后给予肝动脉灌注FUDR联合静脉应用草酸铂化疗,同期对照21例Ⅲ期结直肠癌患者,术后给予草酸铂联合CF/5-FU静脉化疗.主要观察终点为肝转移率及DFS,次要终点为OS和用药安全性.结果:中位随访65(9~119)个月,治疗组肝转移发生率较低(9.5% vs.28.6%,P=0.109),肺转移发生率略高(28.6% vs.14.3%,P=0.256).2组5年DFS(38.1% vs.42.9%,P=0.671)及OS(47.9% vs.45.0%,P=0.784)无统计学差异.化疗副反应多为Ⅰ~Ⅱ度血白细胞减少、恶心呕吐及感觉神经障碍.结论:Ⅲ期结直肠癌术后给予经肝动脉联合静脉系统化疗,与静脉化疗相比,可能会降低肝转移的发生率,DFS及OS无统计学差异,化疗副反应较轻,可耐受.
目的:通過與靜脈輔助化療對照,觀察經肝動脈灌註聯閤靜脈輔助化療對Ⅲ期結直腸癌術後肝轉移、無病生存期及總生存期的影響.方法:2002年1月至2006年3月,21例Ⅲ期結直腸癌患者作為治療組,術後給予肝動脈灌註FUDR聯閤靜脈應用草痠鉑化療,同期對照21例Ⅲ期結直腸癌患者,術後給予草痠鉑聯閤CF/5-FU靜脈化療.主要觀察終點為肝轉移率及DFS,次要終點為OS和用藥安全性.結果:中位隨訪65(9~119)箇月,治療組肝轉移髮生率較低(9.5% vs.28.6%,P=0.109),肺轉移髮生率略高(28.6% vs.14.3%,P=0.256).2組5年DFS(38.1% vs.42.9%,P=0.671)及OS(47.9% vs.45.0%,P=0.784)無統計學差異.化療副反應多為Ⅰ~Ⅱ度血白細胞減少、噁心嘔吐及感覺神經障礙.結論:Ⅲ期結直腸癌術後給予經肝動脈聯閤靜脈繫統化療,與靜脈化療相比,可能會降低肝轉移的髮生率,DFS及OS無統計學差異,化療副反應較輕,可耐受.
목적:통과여정맥보조화료대조,관찰경간동맥관주연합정맥보조화료대Ⅲ기결직장암술후간전이、무병생존기급총생존기적영향.방법:2002년1월지2006년3월,21례Ⅲ기결직장암환자작위치료조,술후급여간동맥관주FUDR연합정맥응용초산박화료,동기대조21례Ⅲ기결직장암환자,술후급여초산박연합CF/5-FU정맥화료.주요관찰종점위간전이솔급DFS,차요종점위OS화용약안전성.결과:중위수방65(9~119)개월,치료조간전이발생솔교저(9.5% vs.28.6%,P=0.109),폐전이발생솔략고(28.6% vs.14.3%,P=0.256).2조5년DFS(38.1% vs.42.9%,P=0.671)급OS(47.9% vs.45.0%,P=0.784)무통계학차이.화료부반응다위Ⅰ~Ⅱ도혈백세포감소、악심구토급감각신경장애.결론:Ⅲ기결직장암술후급여경간동맥연합정맥계통화료,여정맥화료상비,가능회강저간전이적발생솔,DFS급OS무통계학차이,화료부반응교경,가내수.
Objective: This study aims to investigate whether postoperative hepatic arterial infusion combined with systemic adjuvant chemotherapy is more effective compared with systemic adjuvant chemotherapy alone in terms of survival and liver metastasis for patients with stage Ⅲ colorectal cancer. Methods: From January 2002 to March 2006, 21 patients with stage Ⅲ colorectal cancer were assigned to postoperative locoregional chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyuridine and systemic adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (treatment group). Another group of 21 patients were assigned to the systemic adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin as well as fluorouracil and folinic acid (control goup). The primary endpoint of the observation included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and liver metastasis. The secondary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) and toxic effects. Results: Median follow-up was 65 months (range: 9 months to 119 months). The incidence rate of liver metastasis in patients who underwent hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy was 9.5%, whereas that in patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy alone was calculated at 28.6% (P=0.109). By contrast, the incidence of lung metastasis was relatively higher; however, the difference was not significant (28.6% vs. 14.3%, P =0.256). No significant difference in the 5-year DFS (38.1% vs. 42.9%, P=0.671) and the 5-year OS (47.9%vs. 45.0%, P=0.784) was indicated between the two groups. Toxicities such as reduction in leukocytes as well as nausea and peripheral neurosensory toxicity were mild and could be treated by medication. Conclusion: Postoperative hepatic arterial infusion combined with systemic chemotherapy can possibly reduce the occurrence of liver metastasis, but may add no further benefit to the DFS and OS of the patients with stage Ⅲ cancer obtaining systemic chemotherapy alone. The toxicities were mild and tolerable.