浙江中西医结合杂志
浙江中西醫結閤雜誌
절강중서의결합잡지
ZHEJIANG JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED TRADITIONAL CHINESE AND WESTERN MEDICINE
2013年
2期
92-94
,共3页
余碧芸%吴宏成%沈世茉%潘登
餘碧蕓%吳宏成%瀋世茉%潘登
여벽예%오굉성%침세말%반등
肺癌%支气管镜刷检标本%液基细胞学%传统涂片法
肺癌%支氣管鏡刷檢標本%液基細胞學%傳統塗片法
폐암%지기관경쇄검표본%액기세포학%전통도편법
lung cancer%bronchial brushing%liquid-based cytology%test conventional smear
目的:探讨对支气管镜毛刷标本进行液基细胞学检测(LCT)在肺癌诊断中的应用价值.方法:收集159例肺癌患者和同期370例非肺癌患者的支气管镜刷检标本,同时进行LCT和直接涂片法检测,比较两种方法的涂片质量及诊断的阳性率.结果:LCT检测的标本切片质量高,LCT诊断肺癌的敏感度为43.4%,特异度为99.7%.直接涂片法诊断肺癌的敏感度为18.3%,特异度为99.7%.LCT的敏感度高于直接涂片法(P<0.01),特异度与直接涂片法无差异.159例肺癌患者中同时有LCT分类诊断和病理组织学诊断结果者69例,其中LCT分类诊断与病理组织学诊断相符53例,总符合率为76.8%.结论:LCT检测技术能提高肺癌诊断率,支气管镜刷检标本的LCT检测可推广应用于临床.
目的:探討對支氣管鏡毛刷標本進行液基細胞學檢測(LCT)在肺癌診斷中的應用價值.方法:收集159例肺癌患者和同期370例非肺癌患者的支氣管鏡刷檢標本,同時進行LCT和直接塗片法檢測,比較兩種方法的塗片質量及診斷的暘性率.結果:LCT檢測的標本切片質量高,LCT診斷肺癌的敏感度為43.4%,特異度為99.7%.直接塗片法診斷肺癌的敏感度為18.3%,特異度為99.7%.LCT的敏感度高于直接塗片法(P<0.01),特異度與直接塗片法無差異.159例肺癌患者中同時有LCT分類診斷和病理組織學診斷結果者69例,其中LCT分類診斷與病理組織學診斷相符53例,總符閤率為76.8%.結論:LCT檢測技術能提高肺癌診斷率,支氣管鏡刷檢標本的LCT檢測可推廣應用于臨床.
목적:탐토대지기관경모쇄표본진행액기세포학검측(LCT)재폐암진단중적응용개치.방법:수집159례폐암환자화동기370례비폐암환자적지기관경쇄검표본,동시진행LCT화직접도편법검측,비교량충방법적도편질량급진단적양성솔.결과:LCT검측적표본절편질량고,LCT진단폐암적민감도위43.4%,특이도위99.7%.직접도편법진단폐암적민감도위18.3%,특이도위99.7%.LCT적민감도고우직접도편법(P<0.01),특이도여직접도편법무차이.159례폐암환자중동시유LCT분류진단화병리조직학진단결과자69례,기중LCT분류진단여병리조직학진단상부53례,총부합솔위76.8%.결론:LCT검측기술능제고폐암진단솔,지기관경쇄검표본적LCT검측가추엄응용우림상.
Objective:To explore the clinical value of the SurePath liquid-based cytology test (LCT) in cytologi?cal screening of bronchial brushing for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Methods: Bronchial brushing specimens from 159 patients who were diagnosed as having lung cancer and 370 patients who were diagnosed as having be?nign lung disease were studied. The diagnostic sensitivity and cytological findings of LCT were compared with those of conventional smear (CS) method for diagnosing lung cancer. Results: LCT slides showed decreased areas of cell monolayers, a clearer background and distinct, stereoscopic cytological features. LCT had a significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity for lung cancer (43.4%) than the CS method (18.3%, P<0.05). The specificity was the same between the 2 methods. Of the 69 cases which had both LCT and histopathological results, LCT and pathology concordance rate was 76.8%. Conclusions: LCT in cytological screening of bronchial brushing has more diagnostic value of lung cancer and can be easily performed.