中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2012年
24期
65
,共1页
原发性高脂血症%调脂治疗%调脂片%洛伐他汀
原髮性高脂血癥%調脂治療%調脂片%洛伐他汀
원발성고지혈증%조지치료%조지편%락벌타정
Rimary hyperlipidemia%Therapy in adjusting lipid%Tiaozhi tablet%Lovastatin
目的:比较调脂片与洛乏他汀的调脂疗效.方法:120例原发性高脂血症患者随机分为两组:调脂片组60例,口服调脂片,每次服5片,3次/d;洛乏他汀组60例,口服洛乏他汀片,每次20mg,1次/d;疗程都为4周.比较治疗前后血清总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平的变化.结果:调脂片组和洛乏他汀组调脂治疗的总有效率分别为91.7%和93.3%,两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:调脂片和洛乏他汀调脂疗效均显著,两者疗效相似.
目的:比較調脂片與洛乏他汀的調脂療效.方法:120例原髮性高脂血癥患者隨機分為兩組:調脂片組60例,口服調脂片,每次服5片,3次/d;洛乏他汀組60例,口服洛乏他汀片,每次20mg,1次/d;療程都為4週.比較治療前後血清總膽固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白膽固醇(LDL-C)和低密度脂蛋白膽固醇(HDL-C)水平的變化.結果:調脂片組和洛乏他汀組調脂治療的總有效率分彆為91.7%和93.3%,兩組間比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論:調脂片和洛乏他汀調脂療效均顯著,兩者療效相似.
목적:비교조지편여락핍타정적조지료효.방법:120례원발성고지혈증환자수궤분위량조:조지편조60례,구복조지편,매차복5편,3차/d;락핍타정조60례,구복락핍타정편,매차20mg,1차/d;료정도위4주.비교치료전후혈청총담고순(TC)、감유삼지(TG)、고밀도지단백담고순(LDL-C)화저밀도지단백담고순(HDL-C)수평적변화.결과:조지편조화락핍타정조조지치료적총유효솔분별위91.7%화93.3%,량조간비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론:조지편화락핍타정조지료효균현저,량자료효상사.
Objective: To compare the effects of Tiaozhi tablet and Lovastatin in adjusting lipid. Methods: 120 patients of primary hyperlipoproteinemia are randomly divided into 2 groups: Tiaozhi tablet group has 60 patients who take tiaozhi tablet, 5 tablets each time, 3 times a day. Lovastatin group has 60 patients who take Lovastatin, 20mg each time, 1 time a day. The treatment of two groups lasted for 4 weeks. Serum total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels’ changes are compared before and after treatment. Results: The total effective rates of treatments of Tiaozhi tablet group and Lovastatin group are 91.7% and 93.3%. The differences between the two groups are not significantly different (P>0.05). Conclusion: Tiaozhi tablet and Lovastatin are significantly different in adjusting lipid, with similar efficacy.
