中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2013年
2期
47-48
,共2页
神经根型颈椎病%小针刀%电针
神經根型頸椎病%小針刀%電針
신경근형경추병%소침도%전침
Cervicalspondylotic radiculopathy%Small needle knife%Electronic needling
目的:比较针刀与电针对神经根型颈椎病的治疗效果.方法:将86例神经根型颈椎病患者用随机数字表法分成两组,其中针刀组43例,电针组43例.对不同组别2个疗程后的疗效情况进行综合比较.结果:两组疗效率无显著差异(P>0.05);两组进行等级比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:针刀比电针治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效好.
目的:比較針刀與電針對神經根型頸椎病的治療效果.方法:將86例神經根型頸椎病患者用隨機數字錶法分成兩組,其中針刀組43例,電針組43例.對不同組彆2箇療程後的療效情況進行綜閤比較.結果:兩組療效率無顯著差異(P>0.05);兩組進行等級比較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論:針刀比電針治療神經根型頸椎病療效好.
목적:비교침도여전침대신경근형경추병적치료효과.방법:장86례신경근형경추병환자용수궤수자표법분성량조,기중침도조43례,전침조43례.대불동조별2개료정후적료효정황진행종합비교.결과:량조료효솔무현저차이(P>0.05);량조진행등급비교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론:침도비전침치료신경근형경추병료효호.
Objective: To compare the clinical effect of small needle knife and electronic needling in treating cervicalspondylotic radiculopathy. Methods: 86 patients of cervicalspondylotic radiculopathy were randomly divided into two groups, 43 patients in each group. The efficacies in both groups after 2 treatment courses were compared. Results: No significant differences were detected between the efficacies in the two groups (P>0.05), while a significant difference was detected between the grades of the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Small needle knife was better in the efficacy than electronic needling in treating cervicalspondylotic radiculopathy.
