浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)
浙江大學學報(農業與生命科學版)
절강대학학보(농업여생명과학판)
2013年
3期
325-334
,共10页
李海光%施加春*%吴建军
李海光%施加春*%吳建軍
리해광%시가춘*%오건군
土壤重金属%污染场地%空间变异%地统计学%污染源识别
土壤重金屬%汙染場地%空間變異%地統計學%汙染源識彆
토양중금속%오염장지%공간변이%지통계학%오염원식별
soil heavy metal%contaminated site%spatial variability%geostatistics%pollution source identification
采用地统计软件GS+和地理信息系统( geographic information system , GIS)相结合的方法,研究浙江省北部某电池厂(污染场地F1)和火电厂(污染场地F2)周边农田表层土壤(0~20 cm)和亚表层土壤(20~40 cm)汞( Hg)、镉( Cd)、铅( Pb)、锌( Zn)、铜( Cu)、镍( Ni)6种重金属的含量及其空间变异特征;通过反距离权重( inverse distance weighting , IDW)空间插值分析方法对未测点土壤重金属含量进行最优估计,并对这些重金属的来源进行初步识别.结果表明:对于污染场地F1,土壤Cd污染比较突出,有91%表层土壤样点Cd质量分数超过国家《土壤环境质量标准》(GB15618—1995)的2级标准值(Cd >0.3 mg/kg);而且F1表层土壤Cd和Pb质量分数具有相似的空间分布特征,随着与污染场地距离的增加重金属含量逐渐降低;同时F1表层土壤Cd和Pb的质量分数均极显著大于亚表层土壤,说明污染场地F1周边农田表层土壤重金属 Cd和Pb污染主要来自外源污染,且污染源可能是污染场地F1;对于污染场地F2,土壤Cd和Hg污染比较突出,分别有63%和11%表层土壤样点Cd和 Hg质量分数超过国家《土壤环境质量标准》(GB15618—1995)的2级标准值( Hg、Cd >0.3 mg/kg),F2表层土壤Hg质量分数极显著大于亚表层土壤,说明污染场地F2周边农田表层土壤重金属 Hg超标主要来自外源污染.综上可见,污染场地周边农田土壤重金属污染与污染场地的影响密切相关,应该引起高度重视.
採用地統計軟件GS+和地理信息繫統( geographic information system , GIS)相結閤的方法,研究浙江省北部某電池廠(汙染場地F1)和火電廠(汙染場地F2)週邊農田錶層土壤(0~20 cm)和亞錶層土壤(20~40 cm)汞( Hg)、鎘( Cd)、鉛( Pb)、鋅( Zn)、銅( Cu)、鎳( Ni)6種重金屬的含量及其空間變異特徵;通過反距離權重( inverse distance weighting , IDW)空間插值分析方法對未測點土壤重金屬含量進行最優估計,併對這些重金屬的來源進行初步識彆.結果錶明:對于汙染場地F1,土壤Cd汙染比較突齣,有91%錶層土壤樣點Cd質量分數超過國傢《土壤環境質量標準》(GB15618—1995)的2級標準值(Cd >0.3 mg/kg);而且F1錶層土壤Cd和Pb質量分數具有相似的空間分佈特徵,隨著與汙染場地距離的增加重金屬含量逐漸降低;同時F1錶層土壤Cd和Pb的質量分數均極顯著大于亞錶層土壤,說明汙染場地F1週邊農田錶層土壤重金屬 Cd和Pb汙染主要來自外源汙染,且汙染源可能是汙染場地F1;對于汙染場地F2,土壤Cd和Hg汙染比較突齣,分彆有63%和11%錶層土壤樣點Cd和 Hg質量分數超過國傢《土壤環境質量標準》(GB15618—1995)的2級標準值( Hg、Cd >0.3 mg/kg),F2錶層土壤Hg質量分數極顯著大于亞錶層土壤,說明汙染場地F2週邊農田錶層土壤重金屬 Hg超標主要來自外源汙染.綜上可見,汙染場地週邊農田土壤重金屬汙染與汙染場地的影響密切相關,應該引起高度重視.
채용지통계연건GS+화지리신식계통( geographic information system , GIS)상결합적방법,연구절강성북부모전지엄(오염장지F1)화화전엄(오염장지F2)주변농전표층토양(0~20 cm)화아표층토양(20~40 cm)홍( Hg)、력( Cd)、연( Pb)、자( Zn)、동( Cu)、얼( Ni)6충중금속적함량급기공간변이특정;통과반거리권중( inverse distance weighting , IDW)공간삽치분석방법대미측점토양중금속함량진행최우고계,병대저사중금속적래원진행초보식별.결과표명:대우오염장지F1,토양Cd오염비교돌출,유91%표층토양양점Cd질량분수초과국가《토양배경질량표준》(GB15618—1995)적2급표준치(Cd >0.3 mg/kg);이차F1표층토양Cd화Pb질량분수구유상사적공간분포특정,수착여오염장지거리적증가중금속함량축점강저;동시F1표층토양Cd화Pb적질량분수균겁현저대우아표층토양,설명오염장지F1주변농전표층토양중금속 Cd화Pb오염주요래자외원오염,차오염원가능시오염장지F1;대우오염장지F2,토양Cd화Hg오염비교돌출,분별유63%화11%표층토양양점Cd화 Hg질량분수초과국가《토양배경질량표준》(GB15618—1995)적2급표준치( Hg、Cd >0.3 mg/kg),F2표층토양Hg질량분수겁현저대우아표층토양,설명오염장지F2주변농전표층토양중금속 Hg초표주요래자외원오염.종상가견,오염장지주변농전토양중금속오염여오염장지적영향밀절상관,응해인기고도중시.
The pollution of heavy metal is increasingly concerned , especially the soil heavy metals pollution around the contaminated sites . Many researchers have reported a significant increase of heavy metal in the surface soil . However , few reports have been found in the literature about soil heavy metal spatial distribution and source identification around contaminated sites . Therefore , this study has the aim of elucidating the spatial distribution and source identification of soil heavy metals in croplands near two contaminated sites . Our specific objectives were to examine the spatial dependency and the variation mechanism of heavy metals in soils , to map the spatial distribution and risk assessment of soil heavy metals , and to identify the main sources of soil heavy metal pollution .
@@@@The surface soil ( 0 20 cm) and subsurface soil ( 20 40 cm) were collected from nearby fields of a battery plant ( F1) and a thermal power plant ( F2) in the north of Zhejiang Province . The concentrations of soil mercury ( Hg) , cadmium ( Cd) , lead ( Pb) , zinc (Zn) , copper (Cu) , and nickel ( Ni) in these two typical contaminated sites were determined and the spatial distribution patterns and pollution source of the heavy metals were analyzed using Geographic Information System (GIS) and geostatistical methods . Based on the type II limit of Environmental Quality Standard for Soils" ( GB15618—1995) , the single factor method and Nemerow index method were used to assess the comprehensive pollution risks of the soil heavy metals around the contaminated sites . Inverse distance weighted interpolation ( IDW) was used to simulate the pollution risk and spatial distribution and the source identification of these heavy metal pollution .
@@@@Results showed there was a serious soil heavy metal pollution problem around contaminated sites , with Cd concentrations in 80 .77% of the surface soil samples exceeded the type II limit (Cd > 0 .3 mg/kg) of GB15618—1995 . Hg concentrations in 3 .85% of the surface soil samples exceeded the type II limit . Nemerow index method assessment results showed that there were 25 soil samples exceeded the standard , with overproof rate of 48 .08% . Based on the Technical Specif ication for Soil Environmental Monitoring , the maximum index value was 3 .13 , which exhibited heavy pollution . Particularly in nearby contaminated site F1 , soil Cd and Pb pollution were serious problems in the soils , with Cd concentration in 91% of the surface soil samples exceeded the type II limit (Cd > 0 .3 mg/kg) of GB15618—1995 , and the maximum surface soil Cd concentration was 3 .3 mg/kg . The soil Pb pollution was also the potential problem even then its concentration was not exceeded the type II limit . The maximum surface soil Pb concentration was 123 .67 mg/kg , and the mean surface soil Pb concentration was 58 .69 mg/kg . While the surface soil Cd and Pb concentrations were significantly higher than the subsurface soil . At the nearby contaminated site F 2 , soil Cd and Hg pollution were serious problems in the soils . Cd concentrations in 63% of the surface soil samples , and Hg concentrations in 11% of the surface soil samples were higher than the type II limit (Cd > 0 .3 mg/kg , Hg > 0 .3 mg/kg) of GB15618—1995 . The maximum surface soil Cd concentration was 0 .71 mg/kg . The mean surface soil Hg concentration was 0 .214 mg/kg . Cd and Pb concentrations in the surface soil samples from F1 had similar spatial distribution patterns and the concentrations reduced with farther distance away from F1 , and they were significantly higher than those in the corresponding subsurface soils . These results indicated that pollution of soil heavy metals (Cd and Pb) was mainly caused by external pollution , and F 1 was the most probable pollution source . The battery plant can discharge Cd and Pb into environment . At the contaminated site F 2 , the heavy metal concentrations in some soil samples were higher than the type II limit (Cd > 0 .3 mg/kg) of GB15618—1995 . The mean surface soil Hg concentration was significantly ( P < 0 .01) higher than that of the subsurface soil . These results indicated that soil heavy metal Hg pollution at site F2 was mainly caused by external pollution from the thermal power plant and the contaminated site F2 was one of the pollution sources .
@@@@In conclusion , soil heavy metal pollution is a serious problem in the study area around the contaminated sites . The pollution of surface soil by Cd and Pb at the nearby site F1 and the pollution of surface soil by Hg and Cd at the nearby site F2 mainly comes from external pollution sources , the increase of surface soil Cd and Pb concentrations around site F 1 is most likely caused by the contaminated site F1 . Soil pollution by Cd , Pb and Hg of nearby fields is closely related with the contaminated sites F1 and F2 , thus much more attention should be given to the prevention of the heavy metal pollution .