当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2013年
15期
66-67
,共2页
麻醉方式%胃癌%术后疼痛
痳醉方式%胃癌%術後疼痛
마취방식%위암%술후동통
Anesthesia way%Gastric cancer%Postoperative pain
目的探讨采用不同麻醉方式治疗胃癌根治术后患者的疼痛程度情况.方法对比分别在全身麻醉和全麻复合硬膜外麻醉下进行胃癌根治手术患者术后疼痛的程度,采用Prince-Henry进行评价.所得数据均采用统计软件进行处理,两种方式差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结果相比采取全身麻醉的患者,采取全麻复合硬膜外麻醉的复合组患者在术后6、12、18、24 h以及48 h的Prince-Henry平均得分较低.结论胃癌根治手术采取全麻复合硬膜外麻醉可以有效减轻患者的术后疼痛感.
目的探討採用不同痳醉方式治療胃癌根治術後患者的疼痛程度情況.方法對比分彆在全身痳醉和全痳複閤硬膜外痳醉下進行胃癌根治手術患者術後疼痛的程度,採用Prince-Henry進行評價.所得數據均採用統計軟件進行處理,兩種方式差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05).結果相比採取全身痳醉的患者,採取全痳複閤硬膜外痳醉的複閤組患者在術後6、12、18、24 h以及48 h的Prince-Henry平均得分較低.結論胃癌根治手術採取全痳複閤硬膜外痳醉可以有效減輕患者的術後疼痛感.
목적탐토채용불동마취방식치료위암근치술후환자적동통정도정황.방법대비분별재전신마취화전마복합경막외마취하진행위암근치수술환자술후동통적정도,채용Prince-Henry진행평개.소득수거균채용통계연건진행처리,량충방식차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05).결과상비채취전신마취적환자,채취전마복합경막외마취적복합조환자재술후6、12、18、24 h이급48 h적Prince-Henry평균득분교저.결론위암근치수술채취전마복합경막외마취가이유효감경환자적술후동통감.
Objective To adopt different ways of anesthesia treat gastric cancer effect a radical cure patients with postoperative pain degree of comparative study. Methods Contrast respectively in general anesthesia and general anesthesia compound epidural anesthesia for gastric cancer radical surgery patients postoperative pain degree, the Prince-Henry, evaluation. Income data are using statistical software for processing, differences have statistical significance(P<0.05). Results Patients with general anesthesia than take, take general anesthesia compound epidural anesthesia compound group of patients with postoperative 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours of Prince - Henry, scoring average is low. Conclusion Gastric cancer radical operation take general anesthesia compound epidural anesthesia can effectively relieve patients postoperative pain.