CAJ | 학술논문

目的:探讨临床药师对降低心血管介入抗菌药物预防使用率的干预作用.方法:对比临床药师干预前后我院冠状动脉造影术(CAG)和冠状动脉内支架术(PCI)抗菌药物预防使用率和术后感染情况.结果:通过4个阶段的干预,CAG和PCI抗菌药物预防使用率分别由干预前的86.1%和88.3%下降为0%和1.5%,均有显著差异(P<0.05);干预前后术后感染率均为0%,无统计学差异(P=1).结论:临床药师干预对降低心血管介入抗菌药物预防使用率效果显著,充分发挥了药学监督作用,促进了抗菌药物的合理使用.
목적:탐토림상약사대강저심혈관개입항균약물예방사용솔적간예작용.방법:대비림상약사간예전후아원관상동맥조영술(CAG)화관상동맥내지가술(PCI)항균약물예방사용솔화술후감염정황.결과:통과4개계단적간예,CAG화PCI항균약물예방사용솔분별유간예전적86.1%화88.3%하강위0%화1.5%,균유현저차이(P<0.05);간예전후술후감염솔균위0%,무통계학차이(P=1).결론:림상약사간예대강저심혈관개입항균약물예방사용솔효과현저,충분발휘료약학감독작용,촉진료항균약물적합리사용.
@@@@Objective:To explore the antibacterial chemoprophylaxis usage for cardiovascular intervention reduced by Clinical pharmacist's intervention.Methods:Compared the rates of antibacterial chemoprophylaxis usage and postoperative infection for coronary angiography(CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) before and after the clinical pharmacist’s intervention.Results:After the four stages of intervention, the rates of antibacterial chemoprophylaxis usage for CAG and PCI decreased from 86.1%to 0%and 88.3%to 1.5%. There were significant differences (P<0.05);Before and after the pharmacist’s intervention, the postoperative infection rates were 0%.There was no significant difference(P=1). Conclusion:The clinical pharmacist's intervention played an important role in reducing the antibacterial chemoprophylaxis usage for cardiovascular intervention. They supervised pharmacy to promote the rational usage of antimicrobial agents.