按摩与康复医学
按摩與康複醫學
안마여강복의학
Chinese Manipulation & Rehabilitation Medicine
2013年
6期
126-127
,共2页
术后伤口感染%外科手术%规范化%抗生素
術後傷口感染%外科手術%規範化%抗生素
술후상구감염%외과수술%규범화%항생소
postoperative wound infection%surgery%standardization%antibiotics
目的:比较规范化使用抗生素与长期使用抗生素对术后伤口感染的预防效果.方法:将400例手术患者随机分为规范组和长期组,规范组予规范化使用抗生素治疗,长期组予长期应用抗生素治疗,观察两组对术后伤口感染的预防效果.结果:长期组术后伤口感染率高于规范组(P<0.05).结论:长期应用抗生素对术后伤口感染的预防效果并不显著.
目的:比較規範化使用抗生素與長期使用抗生素對術後傷口感染的預防效果.方法:將400例手術患者隨機分為規範組和長期組,規範組予規範化使用抗生素治療,長期組予長期應用抗生素治療,觀察兩組對術後傷口感染的預防效果.結果:長期組術後傷口感染率高于規範組(P<0.05).結論:長期應用抗生素對術後傷口感染的預防效果併不顯著.
목적:비교규범화사용항생소여장기사용항생소대술후상구감염적예방효과.방법:장400례수술환자수궤분위규범조화장기조,규범조여규범화사용항생소치료,장기조여장기응용항생소치료,관찰량조대술후상구감염적예방효과.결과:장기조술후상구감염솔고우규범조(P<0.05).결론:장기응용항생소대술후상구감염적예방효과병불현저.
@@@@Objective:To compare the prevention efficiency between standardized and long-term application of antibiotics to postoperative wound in-fection. Methods:400 cases of surgical patients were randomly divided into standardized group and long-term group, the standardized group treated by standardized application of antibiotics, while the long-term group by long-term application of antibiotics, and observed the prevention efficiency of postoperative wound infection of two groups. Results:The rate of postoperative wound infection in long-term group was higher than that in stan-dardized group (P<0.05). Conclusion:Long-term application of antibiotics doesn’t have a significantly effect on prevention of postoperative wound infection.
